Comparison of different commercial DNA extraction kits and PCR protocols for the detection of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs in faecal samples from foxes

被引:25
|
作者
Maksimov, Pavlo [1 ]
Schares, Gereon [1 ]
Press, Sebastian [1 ]
Froehlich, Andreas [1 ]
Basso, Walter [2 ,3 ]
Herzig, Mandy [1 ]
Conraths, Franz J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Loeffler Inst, Fed Res Inst Anim Hlth, Inst Epidemiol, NRL Echinococcosis, Sudufer 10, D-17493 Greifswald, Germany
[2] Univ Zurich, Vetsuisse Fac, Inst Parasitol, Winterthurerstr 266a, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Vetsuisse Fac, Div Swine Med, Dept Farm Anim, Winterthurerstr 260, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Copro-inhibition; Taeniid eggs; Conventional PCR; DNA isolation; Scat; qPCR; REAL-TIME PCR; VULPES-VULPES; BACTERIAL-DNA; TRANSMISSION; SENSITIVITY; INFECTIONS; DIAGNOSIS; DOGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.02.015
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
Effective and sensitive methods for the molecular detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in faecal samples of final hosts are crucial for the prevention and control of human alveolar echinococcosis and for studies on the epidemiology of the parasite. Little is known about the suitability of commercial test kits for isolating DNA of E. multilocularis from fox faeces and the performance of standard Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) protocols in relation to the quality of DNA extracted by these kits. We compared four different kits: ZR Faecal DNA MiniPrep (TM) (Zymo Research), FastDNA (R) SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals), QIAamp (R) Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN) and NucleoSpin (R) Soil Kit (Macherey-Nagel) for the extraction of DNA from E. multilocularis eggs present in faeces of foxes. Negative faecal samples were spiked with 600, 300, 150, 75, 37, 18, 9, 5 or 2 E. multilocularis eggs, and each egg concentration was tested 10 times with each of the DNA extraction kits. Each extracted DNA sample was amplified using three PCR protocols: i. conventional PCR (cPCR, Platinum (R) Taq, Invitrogen), ii. qPCR with the iQ (TM) Supermix (Bio-Rad) and iii. qPCR with the QuantiTect (R) Multiplex -Master Mix (QIAGEN). The highest analytical sensitivities for molecular detection of E. multilocularis eggs in spiked fox faeces were observed when combining either the QIAamp (R) Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit or the ZR Faecal DNA MiniPrep (TM) kit with the qPCR using the QuantiTect (R) Multiplex -Master Mix (Sensitivities 97% and 94%, respectively). Combinations including the remaining test kits (NucleoSpin (R) Soil Kit and FastDNA (R) SPIN Kit for Soil) showed a markedly lower analytical sensitivity for PCR examinations. The results of the present study indicate that it is of utmost importance to select suitable DNA extraction kits in combination with robust PCR methods or reagents to achieve acceptable analytical sensitivity in the molecular detection of E. multilocularis eggs in fox faecal samples. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 93
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples
    Claassen, Shantelle
    du Toit, Elloise
    Kaba, Mamadou
    Moodley, Clinton
    Zar, Heather J.
    Nicol, Mark P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 94 (02) : 103 - 110
  • [2] Improvement of a polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Echinococcus multilocularis DNA in faecal samples of foxes
    Monnier, P
    Cliquet, F
    Aubert, M
    Bretagne, S
    [J]. VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 1996, 67 (3-4) : 185 - 195
  • [3] Comparison of Two DNA Extraction Methods and Two PCRs for Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in the Stool Samples of Naturally Infected Red Foxes
    Skrzypek, Katarzyna
    Karamon, Jacek
    Samorek-Pierog, Malgorzata
    Dabrowska, Joanna
    Kochanowski, Maciej
    Sroka, Jacek
    Bilska-Zajac, Ewa
    Cencek, Tomasz
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (12): : 1 - 8
  • [4] Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in faeces by nested PCR with the use of diluted DNA samples
    Karamon, J.
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2014, 17 (01): : 79 - 83
  • [5] Comparison of Two Commercial DNA Extraction Kits and PCR Master Mixes for the Detection of Brucella from Blood Samples and Blood Culture Bottles
    Dal, Tuba
    Acikgoz, Ziya Cibali
    Basyigit, Tugcan
    Zeybek, Hasan
    Durmaz, Riza
    [J]. MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2018, 52 (02): : 135 - 146
  • [6] Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for the detection of bacterial genomic DNA from whole-blood samples using a broad-range PCR
    B Krulova
    E Nemcova
    B Zaloudikova
    P Nemec
    T Freiberger
    [J]. Critical Care, 13 (Suppl 4):
  • [7] Assessment of three DNA extraction kits for the absolute quantification of strongyle nematode eggs in faecal samples
    Niclas Högberg
    Paulius Baltrušis
    Nizar Enweji
    Johan Höglund
    [J]. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 64
  • [8] Assessment of three DNA extraction kits for the absolute quantification of strongyle nematode eggs in faecal samples
    Hogberg, Niclas
    Baltrusis, Paulius
    Enweji, Nizar
    Hoglund, Johan
    [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 64 (01)
  • [9] Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from whole-blood samples
    Smith, K
    Diggle, MA
    Clarke, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 2440 - 2443
  • [10] COMPARISON OF COMMERCIAL DNA KITS AND TRADITIONAL DNA EXTRACTION PROCEDURE IN PCR DETECTION OF PORK IN DRY/FERMENTED SAUSAGES
    Djurkin Kusec, I
    Radisic, Z.
    Komlenic, M.
    Kusec, G.
    [J]. POLJOPRIVREDA, 2015, 21 (01): : 199 - 202