Scientific opinion on Prosmoke BW 01

被引:0
|
作者
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl-Heinz
Fowler, Paul J.
Fernandez, Maria Jose Frutos
Furst, Peter
Gundert-Remy, Ursula
Gurtler, Rainer
Husoy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens-Berendsen, Ine
Wolfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Benigni, Romualdo
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cordelli, Eugenia
Chipman, Kevin
Degen, Gisela
Norby, Karin
Svendsen, Camilla
Carfi, Maria
Martino, Carla
Tard, Alexandra
Vianello, Giorgia
Mennes, Wim
机构
关键词
Prosmoke BW 01; smoke flavouring primary product; furan-2(5H)-one; genotoxicity;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7299
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the safety of Prosmoke BW 01 as a new smoke flavouring primary product, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003. Prosmoke BW01 is produced by pyrolysis of beechwood (Fagus sylvatica L.) sawdust. Its water content is estimated at 56 wt%, the total identified volatile fraction accounts for 28 wt% of the primary product, corresponding to 64% of the solvent-free mass, while the unidentified fraction amounts to 16 wt% of the primary product. Analytical data provided for three batches demonstrated that their batch-to-batch-variability was sufficiently low. However, for the batch used for the toxicological studies, there were substantial deviations in the concentration of nearly all the constituents compared to the other three batches. The dietary exposure of Prosmoke BW 01 was estimated to be between 6.2 and 9.2 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day, respectively, using SMK-EPIC and SMK-TAMDI. Using the FAIM tool, the 95th percentile exposure estimates ranged from 3.2 mg/kg bw per day for the elderly to 17.9 mg/kg bw per day for children. The Panel noted that furan-2(5H)-one is present in all batches of the primary product at an average concentration of 0.88 wt%. This substance was evaluated by the FAF Panel as genotoxic in vivo after oral exposure. The Panel considered that the (geno)toxicity studies available on the whole mixture were not adequate to support the safety assessment, due to limitations in these studies and because they were performed with a batch which may not be representative for the material of commerce. Considering that the exposure estimates for furan-2(5H)-one are above the TTC value of 0.0025 mu g/kg bw per day (or 0.15 mu g/person per day) for DNA-reactive mutagens and/or carcinogens, the Panel concluded that Prosmoke BW 01 raises a concern with respect to genotoxicity.
引用
收藏
页数:47
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scientific Opinion on dihydrocapsiate
    Agostini, Carlo Virgilio
    Bresson, Jean-Louis
    Fairweather-Tait, Susan
    Flynn, Albert
    Golly, Ines
    Heinonen, Marina
    Korhonen, Hannu
    Lagiou, Pagona
    Lovik, Martinus
    Marchelli, Rosangela
    Martin, Ambroise
    Moseley, Bevan
    Neuhaeuser-Berthold, Monika
    Przyrembel, Hildegard
    Sanz, Yolanda
    Salminen, Seppo
    Strain, John J.
    Strobel, Stephan
    Tetens, Inge
    Tome, Daniel
    van den Berg, Henk
    van Loveren, Hendrik
    Verhagen, Hans
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (07)
  • [2] SCIENTIFIC OPINION, NOT PROCESS
    NEWBERRY, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1994, 92 (04) : 44 - 44
  • [3] CYBERNETICS AND SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY - RUSSIAN - BIRJUKOW,BW
    SCHULZE, D
    [J]. DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE, 1977, 25 (05): : 622 - 624
  • [4] Opinion versus scientific consensus
    Kinzie, B
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 3 (06) : 303 - 303
  • [5] Scientific Opinion on acrylamide in food
    Benford, Diane
    Ceccatelli, Sandra
    Cottrill, Bruce
    DiNovi, Michael
    Dogliotti, Eugenia
    Edler, Lutz
    Farmer, Peter
    Fuerst, Peter
    Hoogenboom, Laurentius
    Knutsen, Helle Katrine
    Lundebye, Anne-Katrine
    Metzler, Manfred
    Mutti, Antonio
    Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
    O'Keeffe, Michael
    Petersen, Annette
    Rietjens, Ivonne
    Schren, Dieter
    Silano, Vittorio
    van Loveren, Hendrik
    Vleminckx, Christiane
    Wester, Pieter
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (06)
  • [6] EXPERT OPINION OR SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT
    YOUNG, NH
    [J]. SEARCH, 1988, 19 (03): : 157 - 157
  • [7] A conduit for scientific information and opinion
    Shaw, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2003, 44 (02) : 94 - 95
  • [8] Scientific Opinion on Bioreduction application
    Andreoletti, Olivier
    Baggesen, Dorte Lau
    Bolton, Declan
    Butaye, Patrick
    Cook, Paul
    Davies, Robert
    Escamez, Pablo S. Fernandez
    Griffin, John
    Hald, Tine
    Havelaar, Arie
    Koutsoumanis, Kostas
    Lindqvist, Roland
    McLauchlin, James
    Nesbakken, Truls
    Maradona, Miguel Prieto
    Ricci, Antonia
    Simmons, Marion
    Sofos, John
    Threlfall, John
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (12)
  • [9] Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine
    Agostoni, Carlo
    Canani, Roberto Berni
    Fairweather-Tait, Susan
    Heinonen, Marina
    Korhonen, Hannu
    La Vieille, Sebastien
    Marchelli, Rosangela
    Martin, Ambroise
    Naska, Androniki
    Neuhaeuser-Berthold, Monika
    Nowicka, Grazyna
    Sanz, Yolanda
    Siani, Alfonso
    Sjodin, Anders
    Stern, Martin
    Strain, Sean
    Tetens, Inge
    Tome, Daniel
    Turck, Dominique
    Verhagen, Hans
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (05)
  • [10] Scientific Opinion on bovine lactoferrin
    Agostoni, Carlo V.
    Bresson, Jean-Louis
    Fairweather-Tait, Susan
    Flynn, Albert
    Golly, Ines
    Korhonen, Harmu
    Lagiou, Pagona
    Lovik, Martinus
    Marchelli, Rosangela
    Martin, Ambroise
    Moseley, Bevan
    Neuhaeuser-Berthold, Monika
    Przyrembel, Hildegard
    Salminen, Seppo
    Sanz, Yolanda
    Strain, Sean
    Strobel, Stephan
    Tetens, Inge
    Tome, Daniel
    van Loveren, Hendrik
    Verhagen, Hans
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (07)