Component Comparison, Evaluation, and Selection: A Continuous Approach

被引:4
|
作者
Ernst, Neil [1 ]
Kazman, Rick [2 ]
Bianco, Philip [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Comp Sci, Victoria, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Hawaii, Shidler Coll Business, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Software Engn Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00023
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Early visions of component-based software development have been realized, with software projects now composed mostly of other peoples code. However, the challenge of selecting the best components, with speed and confidence in the result, has only become more difficult. Previous work has focused on systematic approaches to component selection, but in continuous-* and agile settings, the increase in confidence from being systematic is not worth the cost of delay. In this emerging ideas paper, we present early results on work to balance speed with confidence in component selection. Our idea is to define a scorecard for components based on high-level quality attribute indicators, project health measures, and a context-specific aggregation function for producing a single yes/ no decision for integrators. We present preliminary results showing how this scorecard approach works on computer vision components.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 90
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Utility Evaluation of a Component Model Selection Framework A quantitative approach
    Aris, Hazleen
    [J]. 2014 SCIENCE AND INFORMATION CONFERENCE (SAI), 2014, : 714 - 719
  • [2] Material selection of a mechanical component based on criteria relationship evaluation and MCDM approach
    Chatterjee, Saikat
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 44 : 1621 - 1626
  • [3] An approach of component evaluation in the component library
    Guo, J
    Jiang, W
    Zhang, B
    Wang, B
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH JOINT INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER CONFERENCE, 2005, : 756 - 761
  • [4] Evaluation of uncertainty utilising the component by component approach
    M. Rösslein
    [J]. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2000, 5 : 88 - 94
  • [5] Evaluation of uncertainty utilising the component by component approach
    Rösslein, M
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2000, 5 (03) : 88 - 94
  • [6] Selection of cross-docking candidates and comparison of evaluation metrics in Continuous Evaluation of Ligand Pose Prediction (CELPP)
    Liu, Shuai
    Wagner, Jeffrey
    Churas, Christopher
    Gathiaka, Symon
    Grethe, Jeffrey
    Chiu, Michael
    Yang, Huanwang
    Burley, Stephen K.
    Amaro, Rommie
    Gilson, Michael
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 253
  • [7] An evolutionary multiobjective approach for the Component Selection Problem
    Vescan, Andreea
    [J]. 2008 FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL INFORMATION AND WEB TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 259 - 264
  • [8] Selection and Evaluation of Component Suppliers Based on Resilience
    Wang, Qiankun
    Duan, Honglei
    Shen, Chuxiong
    [J]. ICCREM 2021: CHALLENGES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY UNDER THE PANDEMIC, 2021, : 425 - 437
  • [9] Towards Efficient Software Component Evaluation: An Examination of Component Selection and Certification
    Land, Rikard
    Alvaro, Alexandre
    Crnkovic, Ivica
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 34TH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS, 2008, : 274 - +
  • [10] PROMETHEE based Component Evaluation and Selection for Component Based Software Engineering
    Kauri, Kulbir
    Singh, Harshpreet
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMMUNICATION CONTROL AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (ICACCCT), 2014, : 1421 - 1425