Assessment of the Feasibility of automated, real-time clinical decision support in the emergency department using electronic health record data

被引:11
|
作者
Perry, Warren M. [1 ,2 ]
Hossain, Rubayet [1 ,2 ]
Taylor, Richard A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Emergency Med Dept, 464 Congress Ave,Suite 260, New Haven, CT 06450 USA
[2] Yale New Haven Med Ctr, Emergency Dept, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] Yale Sch Med, Yale New Haven Hosp, 464 Congress Ave,Suite 260, New Haven, CT 06450 USA
来源
BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2018年 / 18卷
关键词
Clinical decision support; Machine learning; Data quality; Electronic health records; BIG DATA; CARE; RULES; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1186/s12873-018-0170-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The use of big data and machine learning within clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) has the potential to transform medicine through better prognosis, diagnosis and automation of tasks. Real-time application of machine learning algorithms, however, is dependent on data being present and entered prior to, or at the point of, CDSS deployment. Our aim was to determine the feasibility of automating CDSSs within electronic health records (EHRs) by investigating the timing, data categorization, and completeness of documentation of their individual components of two common Clinical Decision Rules (CDRs) in the Emergency Department. Methods: The CURB-65 severity score and HEART score were randomly selected from a list of the top emergency medicine CDRs. Emergency department (ED) visits with ICD-9 codes applicable to our CDRs were eligible. The charts were reviewed to determine the categorization components of the CDRs as structured and/or unstructured, median times of documentation, portion of charts with all data components documented as structured data, portion of charts with all structured CDR components documented before ED departure. A kappa score was calculated for interrater reliability. Results: The components of the CDRs were mainly documented as structured data for the CURB-65 severity score and HEART score. In the CURB-65 group, 26.8% of charts had all components documented as structured data, and 67.8% in the HEART score. Documentation of some CDR components often occurred late for both CDRs. Only 21 and 11% of patients had all CDR components documented as structured data prior to ED departure for the CURB-65 and HEART score groups, respectively. The interrater reliability for the CURB-65 score review was 0.75 and 0.65 for the HEART score. Conclusion: Our study found that EHRs may be unable to automatically calculate popular CDRs-such as the CURB-65 severity score and HEART score-due to missing components and late data entry.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of the Feasibility of automated, real-time clinical decision support in the emergency department using electronic health record data
    Warren M. Perry
    Rubayet Hossain
    Richard A. Taylor
    [J]. BMC Emergency Medicine, 18
  • [2] Real-time biosurveillance using an existing emergency department electronic medical record database
    Dennis Cochrane
    John Allegra
    Jonathan Rothman
    [J]. Journal of Urban Health, 2003, 80 (Suppl 1) : i120 - i121
  • [3] Combining Structured and Free-text Electronic Medical Record Data for Real-time Clinical Decision Support
    Apostolova, Emilia
    Wang, Tony
    Koutroulis, Ioannis
    Tschampel, Tim
    Velez, Tom
    [J]. SIGBIOMED WORKSHOP ON BIOMEDICAL NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (BIONLP 2019), 2019, : 66 - 70
  • [4] Feasibility of Sepsis Phenotyping Using Electronic Health Record Data During Initial Emergency Department Care
    Seymour, C. W.
    Kennedy, J.
    Wang, S.
    Xu, Z.
    Chang, C. H.
    Mi, Q.
    Vodovotz, Y.
    Clermont, G.
    Visweswaran, S.
    Weiss, J. C.
    Cooper, G.
    Gomez, H.
    Kellum, J. A.
    Angus, D. C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197
  • [5] Scope and Influence of Electronic Health Record-Integrated Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review
    Patterson, Brian W.
    Pulia, Michael S.
    Ravi, Shashank
    Hoonakker, Peter L. T.
    Hundt, Ann Schoofs
    Wiegmann, Douglas
    Wirkus, Emily J.
    Johnson, Stephen
    Carayon, Pascale
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 74 (02) : 285 - 296
  • [6] Clinical Decision Support for Hyperbilirubinemia Risk Assessment in the Electronic Health Record
    Petersen, John D.
    Lozovatsky, Margaret
    Markovic, Daniela
    Duncan, Ray
    Zheng, Simon
    Shamsian, Arash
    Kagele, Sonya
    Ross, Mindy K.
    [J]. ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2020, 20 (06) : 857 - 862
  • [7] Working at the intersection of context, culture, and technology: Provider perspectives on antimicrobial stewardship in the emergency department using electronic health record clinical decision support
    Chung, Phillip
    Scandlyn, Jean
    Dayan, Peter S.
    Mistry, Rakesh D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2017, 45 (11) : 1198 - 1202
  • [8] Monitoring clinical decision support in the electronic health record
    Lam, Jason H.
    Ng, Olivia
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2017, 74 (15) : 1130 - 1133
  • [9] Implementation of Electronic Health Record Integration and Clinical Decision Support to Improve Emergency Department Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use
    Hoppe, Jason A.
    Ledbetter, Caroline
    Tolle, Heather
    Heard, Kennon
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 83 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [10] Clinical Decision Support in the Electronic Medical Record to Increase Rates of Influenza Vaccination in a Pediatric Emergency Department
    Buenger, Lauren E.
    Webber, Emily C.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2020, 36 (11) : E641 - E645