Who is interacting with researchers on Twitter? A survey in the field of Information Science

被引:8
|
作者
Alvarez-Bornstein, Belen [1 ]
Montesi, Michela [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Ctr Humanities & Social Sci CCHS, IFS, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Bibliotecon & Documentac, Madrid, Spain
来源
JLIS.IT | 2019年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
Altmetrics; Societal Impact of Research; Communication; Library and Information Science; Twitter; Social Media Interactions; BROADER IMPACT; ALTMETRICS; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.4403/jlis.it-12530
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The social web appears a promising environment to study the societal impact of research, and, although platforms such as Twitter appear to be popular to share scientific content, little is known about the outreach of scientific communication on social media. By surveying a sample of Twitter users who are also followers of communication and Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers, this article aims to understand who is interacting with researchers on Twitter and if the activity of following allows to get closer to science and research. A survey was sent to all followers of 9 active researchers, and 53 responses were collected and analyzed. According to the results, followers are mostly professionals (49%) although the higher education sector (36%) accounts for an important part of the audience. Twitter allows respondents to keep updated, feel as a part of the scientific community and gain more visibility, whereas interactions appear as an important though secondary facet of these users' activity on Twitter. Finally, participants consider that they do not have influence on the scientific process, maybe because the flow of information on Twitter occurs mostly as retweeting in an unidirectional fashion. More research is needed in order to understand better interactions and engagement on social media before they can be quantified and measured as indicators of societal impact of research.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 106
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Researchers' communication on Twitter. A virtual ethnography in the area of information science
    Alvarez-Bornstein, Belen
    Montesi, Michela
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA, 2016, 39 (04):
  • [2] A SURVEY ON INFORMATION CREDIBILITY ON TWITTER
    An, Jun
    Li, Weijiang
    Ji, Leina
    Wang, Feng
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND MEASURING TECHNOLOGY III, PTS 1-3, 2013, 401 : 1788 - 1791
  • [3] Academic information on Twitter: A user survey
    Mohammadi, Ehsan
    Thelwall, Mike
    Kwasny, Mary
    Holmes, Kristi L.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (05):
  • [4] SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY Who are the science stars of Twitter?
    You, Jia
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2014, 345 (6203) : 1440 - 1441
  • [5] “A field of crop scientists” — Twitter delivers collective nouns for researchers
    Dalmeet Singh Chawla
    [J]. Nature, 2016, 530 (7589) : 133 - 133
  • [6] TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR RESEARCHERS IN INFORMATION SCIENCE IN BRAZIL
    de Araujo Freire, Gustavo Henrique
    Freire, Isa Maria
    [J]. INFORMACAO & SOCIEDADE-ESTUDOS, 2018, 28 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [7] Blockchain : At a glance idea for information science researchers
    Miah, Muhammed
    Miah, Shah Jahan
    Venkatraman, Santosh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION & OPTIMIZATION SCIENCES, 2021, 42 (07): : 1589 - 1624
  • [8] Contributions by Iranian library and information science researchers
    Jamali, Hamid R.
    [J]. ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 63 (06): : 553 - 554
  • [9] Internet information for animal science and nutrition researchers
    Kamelmacher, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2000, 20 (06) : 372 - 372
  • [10] Who Will Tweet More? Finding Information Feeders in Twitter
    Gu, Beibei
    Luo, Zhunchen
    Wang, Xin
    [J]. NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING AND INTELLIGENT APPLICATIONS (NLPCC 2016), 2016, 10102 : 437 - 448