Impact of type of dialyzable beta-blockers on subsequent risk of mortality in patients receiving dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Yeh, Tzu-Hsuan [1 ]
Tu, Kuan-Chieh [1 ]
Hung, Kuo-Chuan [2 ]
Chuang, Min-Hsiang [1 ]
Chen, Jui-Yi [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept & Nternal Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Hlth & Nutr, Tainan, Taiwan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 12期
关键词
PHARMACOKINETICS; ATENOLOL; CARVEDILOL; HEMODIALYSIS; HYPERTENSION; METOPROLOL; BLOCKADE; FAILURE; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0279680
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Beta-blockers has been reported to improve all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients receiving dialysis, but type of beta-blockers (i.e., high vs. low dialyzable) on patient outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed at assessing the outcomes of patients receiving dialyzable beta-blockers (DBBs) compared to those receiving non-dialyzable beta-blockers (NDBBs). Methods We searched the databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials. gov until 28 February 2022 to identify articles investigating the impact of DBBs/NDBBs among patients with renal failure receiving hemodialysis/peritoneal dialysis (HD/PD). The primary outcome was risks of all-cause mortality, while the secondary outcomes included risk of overall major adverse cardiac event (MACE), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure (HF). We rated the certainty of evidence (COE) by Cochrane methods and the GRADE approach. Results Analysis of four observational studies including 75,193 individuals undergoing dialysis in hospital and community settings after a follow-up from 180 days to six years showed an overall all-cause mortality rate of 11.56% (DBBs and NDBBs: 12.32% and 10.7%, respectively) without significant differences in risks of mortality between the two groups [random effect, aHR 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-1.02), p = 0.11], overall MACE [OR 1.03 (95% CI, 0.781.38), p = 0.82], and AMI [OR 1.02 (95% CI, 0.94-1.1), p = 0.66]. Nevertheless, the pooled odds ratio of HF among patients receiving DBBs was lower than those receiving NDBB [random effect, OR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.93), p<0.001]. The COE was considered low for overall MACE, AMI and HF, while it was deemed moderate for all-cause mortality. Conclusions The use of dialyzable and non-dialyzable beta-blockers had no impact on the risk of allcause mortality, overall MACE, and AMI among dialysis patients. However, DBBs were associated with significant reduction in risk of HF compared with NDBBs. The limited number of available studies warranted further large-scale clinical investigations to support our findings.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Beta-Blockers on Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Dialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jin, Jingjing
    Guo, Xiaoyang
    Yu, Qiyao
    [J]. BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2019, 48 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [2] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS ON THE CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS RECEIVING BETA BLOCKERS
    Chung, E.
    Lin, R.
    Negishi, K.
    Komala, M. G.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 26 : 55 - 55
  • [3] Effect of Premorbid Beta-Blockers on Mortality in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hasegawa, Daisuke
    Sato, Ryota
    Prasitlumkum, Narut
    Nishida, Kazuki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (07) : 908 - 916
  • [4] The impact of beta-blockers on mortality in stable angina: a meta-analysis
    Huang, H. L.
    Fox, K. A. A.
    [J]. SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 57 (02) : 69 - 75
  • [5] Impact of premorbid use of beta-blockers on survival outcomes of patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chu, Huan
    Fei, Fengmin
    Su, Yao
    Zhou, Huifei
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [6] Effect of beta-blockers on survival of lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Coelho, Marisa
    Squizzato, Alessandro
    Cassina, Niccolo
    Marino, Franca
    Ribeiro, Laura Virginia
    Cosentino, Marco
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2020, 29 (04) : 306 - 314
  • [7] Tolerability and effectiveness of beta-blockers in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kang, Yu
    Qu, Nan
    Zhang, Zhongyin
    Zhang, Qing
    Chen, Xiaojing
    Fu, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 402
  • [8] Effect of Beta-Blockers on Survival in Patients with Cirrhosis and Ascites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chirapongsathorn, Sakkarin
    Valentin, Nelson
    Alahdab, Fares
    Krittanawong, Chayakrit
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Murad, Mohammad H.
    Kamath, Patrick S.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 62 : 356A - 356A
  • [9] Prognostic role of beta-blockers for Melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, A. R.
    Snyder, A. N.
    Elston, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 141 (09) : B16 - B16
  • [10] Beta-blockers for the prevention of headache in adults, a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jackson, Jeffrey L.
    Kuriyama, Akira
    Kuwatsuka, Yachiyo
    Nickoloff, Sarah
    Storch, Derek
    Jackson, Wilkins
    Zhang, Zhi-Jiang
    Hayashino, Yasuaki
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):