The cost-effectiveness of rosacea treatments

被引:12
|
作者
Thomas, Kristen [1 ]
Yelverton, Christopher B. [1 ]
Yentzer, Brad A. [1 ]
Balkrishnan, Rajesh [4 ]
Fleischer, Alan B., Jr. [1 ]
Feldman, Steven R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Acne rosacea; cost-benefit analysis; drug therapy; ACID 15-PERCENT GEL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PAPULOPUSTULAR ROSACEA; EFFICACY; SAFETY; WOMEN; VEHICLE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1080/09546630802314662
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Topical and oral antibiotic/anti-inflammatory agents are mainstays of therapy for rosacea. However, costs and efficacies of these therapies vary widely. Objective: To determine relative cost-effectiveness of common therapeutic regimens using published data. Methods: Average daily costs (ADC) were determined based on treatment frequency and estimated gram usage for facial application of topical regimens of metronidazole (0.75%, 1%), azelaic acid (15%, 20%), sodium sulfacetamide and sulfur 10%/5%, and oral regimens of tetracycline, doxycycline, and isotretinoin. The ADC was compared with published efficacy rates from clinical trials, with efforts to standardize outcome measures. Based on these efficacy rates, costs per success were calculated and combined with office visit costs to estimate the total cost for each treatment for a 15-week period. Results: The medication cost per treatment success of topical regimens ranged from $60.90 ($205.40, total, including office visits) for metronidazole 1% gel once daily, to $152.25 ($296.75, total) for azelaic acid 20% cream twice daily. Tetracycline 250 mg/day was the least costly oral agent at $6.30 per treatment success, or $150.80 total. Conclusion: Based on our best assessments of retrospective data from the literature, metronidazole 1% gel, once daily, was considerably less costly than several other branded and generic alternatives.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 75
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF OA TREATMENTS
    Losina, E.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2016, 24 : S2 - S2
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of treatments of hypertension
    Rubió, PP
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 2000, 115 (18): : 718 - 718
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of treatments in psoriasis
    Lambert, JRMG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 1999, 10 : S9 - S13
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of pediatric asthma treatments
    Murphy, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 111 (01) : 202 - 202
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer treatments
    van den Hout, WB
    van den Brink, M
    Stiggelbout, AM
    van de Velde, CJH
    Kievit, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (07) : 953 - 963
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of root caries preventive treatments
    Schwendicke, Falk
    Goestemeyer, Gerd
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2017, 56 : 58 - 64
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness in the surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia
    Patrick Fransen
    [J]. Acta Neurologica Belgica, 2012, 112 : 245 - 247
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of infertility treatments: A cohort study
    VanVoorhis, BJ
    Sparks, AET
    Allen, BD
    Stovall, DW
    Syrop, CH
    Chapler, FK
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1997, 67 (05) : 830 - 836
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of treatments for dysfunctional uterine bleeding
    Wade, Sally W.
    Magee, Glenn
    Metz, Laurent
    Broder, Michael S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 51 (07) : 553 - 562
  • [10] Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis of medical treatments
    Jen, Min-Hua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2021, 184 (04) : 1608 - 1609