Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect

被引:58
|
作者
Ögmen, H
Patel, SS
Bedell, HE
Camuz, K
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Ctr Neuroengn & Cognit Sci, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[3] Univ Houston, Coll Optometry, Houston, TX 77204 USA
关键词
motion integration; transient and steady-state phase; model;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.003
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
To investigate the dynamics of the position computation process for a moving object in human vision, we measured the response to a continuous change in position at a constant velocity (ramp-response) using the flash-lag illusion. In this illusion, flashed and moving objects appear spatially offset when their retinal images are physically aligned. The steady-state phase of the ramp-response was probed using the "continuous-motion" (CM) paradigm, in which the motion of the moving object starts long before the occurrence of the flash. To probe the transient phase of the ramp-response, we used the "flash-initiated cycle" (FIC) paradigm, in which the motion of the moving object starts within a short time window around the presentation of the flash. The sampling instant of the ramp-response was varied systematically by changing the luminance or the presentation time of the flashed stimulus. We found that the perceived flash misalignments in the FIC and CM paradigms were approximately equal when sampling of the ramp-response occurred after a relatively long delay from the onset of motion and, were significantly different when sampling of the ramp-response occurred at a relatively short delay. The systematic variations in the perceived misalignment between the moving and flashed stimuli as a function of stimulus parameters are compared to the predictions of our differential latency and to alternative models of position computation. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2109 / 2128
页数:20
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Simple differential latencies modulate, but do not cause the flash-lag effect
    Arnold, Derek H.
    Ong, Yolanda
    Roseboom, Warrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (05):
  • [2] Predictability and the dynamics of position processing in the flash-lag effect
    Vreven, D
    Verghese, P
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2005, 34 (01) : 31 - 44
  • [3] A second moving object influences the flash-lag effect
    Maiche, A
    Gomez, L
    Budelli, R
    Estaún, S
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2004, 33 : 155 - 156
  • [4] Perceptual organization of moving stimuli modulates the flash-lag effect
    Watanabe, K
    Nijhawan, R
    Khurana, B
    Shimojo, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 27 (04) : 879 - 894
  • [5] Testing the differential latency model of the flash-lag effect
    Chappell, M
    Acworth, C
    Hine, TJ
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 56 : 109 - 109
  • [6] Global configuration of moving stimuli modulates the flash-lag effect
    Watanabe, K
    Nijhawan, R
    Khurana, B
    Shimojo, S
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1999, 40 (04) : S358 - S358
  • [7] Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual flash-lag effect
    Arrighi, R
    Alais, D
    Burr, D
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2005, 45 (23) : 2917 - 2925
  • [8] Observer's control of the moving stimulus increases the flash-lag effect
    Scocchia, L.
    Actis-Grosso, R.
    de Sperati, C.
    Stucchi, N.
    Baud-Bovy, G.
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2009, 38 : 68 - 68
  • [9] Observer's control of the moving stimulus increases the flash-lag effect
    Scocchia, Lisa
    Grosso, Rossana Actis
    de'Sperati, Claudio
    Stucchi, Natale
    Baud-Bovy, Gabriel
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2009, 49 (19) : 2363 - 2370
  • [10] The Perceived Position of Moving Objects: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Area MT+ Reduces the Flash-Lag Effect
    Maus, Gerrit W.
    Ward, Jamie
    Nijhawan, Romi
    Whitney, David
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2013, 23 (01) : 241 - 247