Ritual Capital for Rural Livelihood and Sustainable Tourism Development in Indonesia

被引:15
|
作者
Singgalen, Yerik Afrianto [1 ]
Sasongko, Gatot [1 ]
Wiloso, Pamerdi Giri [1 ]
机构
[1] Satya Wacana Christian Univ, Dev Studies Interdisciplinary Fac, Jl Diponegoro 52-60, Salatiga 50711, Indonesia
来源
MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA | 2019年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
ritual capital; sustainable livelihood approach; rural livelihood; sustainable tourism development; LESSONS; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.7226/jtfm.25.2.115
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Sustainable livelihood approach has been a strategic approach that can improve the economy of rural communities and create harmonization of socio-cultural, economic, environmental and political development through policies. However, it is holistic and contextual, enabling the existence of different capital characteristics formed based on the community's culture. The Indonesian context shows that customary rituals of the community in Kakara and Limau villages in North Halmahera Regency are forms of capital that mobilize claims and access to capital such as natural, human, physical, financial, and social capital. This article aims to describe the ritual capital in rural livelihood for sustainable tourism development. Key informants involved were leaders of community, traditions, religion and rural government and they were interviewed to obtain in-depth information about the ritual capital. The results indicate that the ritual capital was integrated with the rural tourism development, enhancing the capabilities of the customary community in the Kakara and Limau Village to access other capital. This finding supports the argument explaining that ritual capital is a livelihood asset in the context of tourism development in North Halmahera Regency, Indonesia.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 125
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social capital for sustainable tourism development in Indonesia
    Prayitno, Gunawan
    Auliah, Aidha
    Ari, Ismu Rini Dwi
    Effendi, Achmad
    Hayat, Ainul
    Delisa, Ahmad
    Siankwilimba, Enock
    Hiddlestone-Mumford, Jacqueline
    [J]. COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [2] Sustainable Livelihood Capital and Strategy in Rural Tourism Households: A Seasonality Perspective
    Su, Zhen
    Aaron, Joshua R.
    Guan, Yang
    Wang, Hongchen
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (18)
  • [3] Difference of Farmers' Livelihood Capital before and after Rural Tourism Development
    Xiao Yi
    Tan Xixi
    Pan Lu
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [4] Potential of coffee tourism for rural development in Ethiopia: a sustainable livelihood approach
    Tamagn Woyesa
    Satinder Kumar
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 : 815 - 832
  • [5] Potential of coffee tourism for rural development in Ethiopia: a sustainable livelihood approach
    Woyesa, Tamagn
    Kumar, Satinder
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (01) : 815 - 832
  • [6] Livelihood and Rural Tourism Development in Coastal Area North Maluku Province Indonesia
    Singgalen, Yerik Afrianto
    Simange, Silvanus Maxwell
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRONTIER OF SCIENCE AND SOCIETY (ICFSS-2017): MARITIME PERSPECTIVES TO PUBLIC DISCOURSE, 2018, 156
  • [7] Study on the Impact of Rural Tourism Construction Projects on Farmers' Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Options
    Li, Zexian
    Wang, Yuejian
    Wang, Lei
    Xu, Liping
    Chen, Huanhuan
    Yao, Chenglong
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [8] Tourism wetlands and rural sustainable livelihood: The case from Iran
    Aazami, Mousa
    Shanazi, Karwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM-RESEARCH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 30
  • [9] Not Just Survive, But Thrive: Examining Livelihood Capital, Poverty Reduction, and Sustainable Development in Ethnic Tourism Destinations
    Huang, Yanling
    Feng, Min
    Li, Xiang
    [J]. CORNELL HOSPITALITY QUARTERLY, 2024,
  • [10] Sustainable Rural Tourism: Lessons for Rural Development
    McAreavey, Ruth
    McDonagh, John
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2011, 51 (02) : 175 - 194