Sparse Graph Regularization for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Classification

被引:37
|
作者
Xue, Zhaohui [1 ]
Du, Peijun [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Li, Jun [6 ]
Su, Hongjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Sch Earth Sci & Engn, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Adm Surveying Mapping & Geoinformat China, Key Lab Satellite Mapping Technol & Applicat, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Geog Informat Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Ctr Collaborat Innovat Geog Informat Reso, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr South China Sea Studies, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[6] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Urbanizat & Geosimulat, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Active learning (AL); hyperspectral image (HSI) classification; semisupervised learning; sparse graph regularization; sparse representation (SR); total variation; SPECTRAL-SPATIAL CLASSIFICATION; SEMI-SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION; SEMISUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION; TRANSDUCTIVE SVM; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2016.2641985
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Regularization has appeared explicitly in hyperspectral image (HSI) classification community, which serves as a promising paradigm for leveraging labeled and unlabeled information, computer's automation and user's interaction, spectral and spatial information, and so on. Graph-based regularization is capable of modeling the nonlinear structures embedded in high-dimensional space, with the great potential for HSI classification. However, traditional methods exhibit low capacity when facing noisy and large-scale data, thus posing a big challenge for their successful use in this community. In this paper, we present two novel sparse graph regularization methods, SGR and SGR with total variation (TV-SGR). In SGR, the labels of large unknown data are propagated based on the fraction matrix and the prediction function, where the fraction matrix is obtained using an effective sparse representation (SR) algorithm with respect to the dictionary, and the prediction function is estimated by optimizing a typical graph-based regularization problem. In contrast, TV-SGR is an extension of SGR by considering spatial information modeled by total variation in SR. Propagating the prediction function from dictionary to large unknown data using the fraction matrix is the essence of the paradigm. SGR and TV-SGR can be equipped with semisupervised learning, active learning, and spectral-spatial classification with large flexibility. The experimental results with two popular hyperspectral data sets indicate that the proposed methods outperform some state-of-the-art approaches in terms of computational efficacy, classification accuracy, and robustness to noise.
引用
收藏
页码:2351 / 2366
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sparse discriminant learning with l1-graph for hyperspectral remote-sensing image classification
    Huang, Hong
    Luo, Fulin
    Ma, Zezhong
    Liu, Zhihua
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 36 (05) : 1307 - 1328
  • [2] Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Kernel Sparse Representation and Semilocal Spatial Graph Regularization
    Liu, Jianjun
    Wu, Zebin
    Sun, Le
    Wei, Zhihui
    Xiao, Liang
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2014, 11 (08) : 1320 - 1324
  • [3] Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Sparse Superpixel Graph
    Zhao, Yifei
    Yan, Fengqin
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [4] Simultaneous Sparse Graph Embedding for Hyperspectral Image Classification
    Xue, Zhaohui
    Du, Peijun
    Li, Jun
    Su, Hongjun
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 53 (11): : 6114 - 6133
  • [5] A DBN for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Classification
    Tong Guofeng
    Li Yong
    Cao Lihao
    Jin Chen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 12TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2017, : 1757 - 1762
  • [6] CLASSIFICATION OF TIANGONG-1 HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGE VIA CONTEXTUAL SPARSE CODING
    Lv, Qi
    Dou, Yong
    Niu, Xin
    Xu, Jiaqing
    Xu, Jinbo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS (ICMLC), VOL. 1, 2015, : 128 - 133
  • [7] Collaborative Sparse Coding with Smoothness Regularization for Hyperspectral-Image Classification
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Ruisheng
    Ji, Xiaofei
    Wang, Yangyang
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 85 (09): : 659 - 672
  • [8] Label Noise Cleansing with Sparse Graph for Hyperspectral Image Classification
    Leng, Qingming
    Yang, Haiou
    Jiang, Junjun
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [9] Weighted Sparse Graph Regularization for Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Images
    Xue, Zhaohui
    Yang, Sirui
    Zhang, Ling
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2021, 18 (09) : 1630 - 1634
  • [10] Hyperspectral remote sensing image classification based on SDE
    Huang, Hong
    Yang, Mei
    Zhang, Man-Ju
    [J]. Guangxue Jingmi Gongcheng/Optics and Precision Engineering, 2013, 21 (11): : 2922 - 2930