共 50 条
Feeding by heterotrophic protists on the toxic dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata
被引:12
|作者:
Du Yoo, Yeong
[1
]
Jeong, Hae Jin
[2
,3
]
Lee, Sung Yeon
[2
]
Yoon, Eun Young
[3
]
Kang, Nam Seon
[2
]
Lim, An Suk
[2
]
Lee, Kyung Ha
[2
]
Jang, Se Hyeon
[2
]
Park, Jae Yeon
[3
]
Kim, Hyung Seop
[1
]
机构:
[1] Kunsan Natl Univ, Dept Marine Biotechnol, Kunsan 573701, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Coll Nat Sci, Seoul 151747, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Gyeonggi Prov, Environm Energy Resource Inst, Adv Inst Convergence Technol, Suwon 443270, South Korea
来源:
基金:
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词:
Gyrodinium;
Harmful algal bloom;
Ingestion;
Polykrikos;
Red tide;
Toxin;
RED-TIDE;
COASTAL WATERS;
GRAZING IMPACT;
JEJU ISLAND;
MIXOTROPHIC DINOFLAGELLATE;
MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION;
PHYTOPLANKTON ASSEMBLAGES;
GYMNODINIUM-CATENATUM;
GYRODINIUM MOESTRUPII;
ALEXANDRIUM-TAMARENSE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.hal.2015.08.001
中图分类号:
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号:
071004 ;
摘要:
Ostreopsis cf. ovata is a toxic dinoflagellate with a wide distribution, from tropical to temperate waters. This species is primarily an epiphytic benthic dinoflagellate, but it also lives in the water column and sometimes forms harmful red tides. The taxonomy, physiology, and distribution of O. cf. ovata have been extensively investigated, and toxin production by this species is well documented. However, data regarding potential predators of this toxic dinoflagellate are lacking. In particular, no studies of heterotrophic protistan grazers have been conducted. To investigate feeding by the heterotrophic dinoflagellates (HTDs) and a ciliate on O. cf. ovata, whether the common HTDs Gyrodinium dominans, Gyrodinium moestrupii, Gyrodinium spirale, Oxyrrhis marina, Pfiesteria piscicida, Polykrikos kofoidii; Protoperidinium bipes, and Stoeckeria algicida and the naked ciliate Strobilidium sp. are able to feed on O. cf. ovata was tested. In addition, the growth and ingestion rates of G. moestrupii and P. kofoidii on O. cf. ovata as a function of prey concentration were measured because this prey supported positive growth of only these two predators. Furthermore, these growth and ingestion rates were compared with those on the other algal prey for exploring comparative nutritional value of this prey. G. dominans, G. moestrupii, O. marina, P. piscicida, and P. kofoidii were able to feed on O. cf ovata; in contrast, G. spirale, P. bipes, S. algicida, and Strobilidium sp. were unable to feed on this prey species. The maximum growth rates of G. moestrupii and P. kofoidii on O. cf. ovata were 0.86 and 0.73 day(-1), respectively, while the maximum ingestion rates were 6.2 and 33.3 ng C predator(-1) day(-1), respectively. The maximum ingestion rates of G. moestrupii and P. kofoidii on O. cf. ovata were higher than the previously reported values for these two predators on any other dinoflagellate prey; on the other hand, the maximum specific growth rates of G. moestrupii and P. kofoidii feeding on O. cf. ovata were intermediate to the previously reported values for these two predators on any other dinoflagellate prey. With the exception of the small dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum, the maximum swimming speed of O. cf ovata was lower than that of any other dinoflagellate prey. The results of the present study suggest that O. cf. ovata is an easily edible prey because of its slow swimming speed; however, this species is not a nutritional prey for growth of G. moestrupii or P. kofoidii. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
相似文献