How are we doing? The impact of motives and information use on the evaluation of romantic relationships

被引:15
|
作者
Wayment, HA
Campbell, S
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Dept Psychol, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] Middlebury Coll, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA
关键词
evaluation motives; personal standards; relationship evaluation;
D O I
10.1177/0265407500171002
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
A multidimensional model of self-evaluation was modified to examine individuals' perceptions of how they evaluate their romantic relationships. Participants provided estimates of the frequency and usefulness of 10 types of information (objective information, feedback from others, personal standards, feared future relationships, future ideals, positive and negative past relationship information, upward, lateral, and downward social comparison) for meeting four motives (enhancement, improvement, verification, and accuracy) in the context of a romantic relationship. Results from three studies indicate th at, overall, personal standards, objective information, and future ideals information were perceived as being used most often to evaluate one's romantic relationship. These types of information were reported as being most useful for meeting all four motives. Social comparison information was reported as least useful and used least often for relationship evaluation. The discussion focuses on the usefulness of considering multiple motives and information types in order to understand how individuals may be evaluating their romantic relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 52
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Information to patients: How are we doing? A DGH experience
    Jayakumar, K. S.
    Ellis, S.
    Binder, A.
    Axon, J.
    Jeffrey, S.
    Lerpiniere, S.
    Gordon, F.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 45 : I81 - I81
  • [2] Evaluation of colonoscopy skills - how well are we doing?
    Mohamed, Rachid
    Shaheen, Abdel Aziz
    Raman, Maitreyi
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 25 (04): : 198 - 200
  • [3] How are we doing? The problem of in-training evaluation
    Lowitt, NR
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 (08) : 605 - 606
  • [4] How are we doing? The problem of in-training evaluation
    Nancy Ryan Lowitt
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2000, 15 : 605 - 606
  • [5] Social Work Practitioners and Practice Evaluation: How Are We Doing?
    Baker, Lisa R.
    Stephens, Frederick
    Hitchcock, Laurel
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR IN THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 20 (08) : 963 - 973
  • [6] Patient and family perceptions of the neuropsychological evaluation: How are we doing?
    Westervelt, Holly James
    Brown, Laura B.
    Tremont, Geoffrey
    Javorsky, Debbie J.
    Stern, Robert A.
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 21 (02) : 263 - 273
  • [7] Referring physicians' perceptions of the neuropsychological evaluation: how are we doing?
    Tremont, G
    Westervelt, HJ
    Podolanczuk, A
    Javorsky, D
    Stern, RA
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 16 (08) : 808 - 808
  • [8] Patient and family perceptions of the neuropsychological evaluation: how are we doing?
    Westervelt, H
    Brown, LB
    Tremont, G
    Stern, RA
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 20 (07) : 895 - 895
  • [9] Referring physicians' perceptions of the neuropsychological evaluation: How are we doing?
    Tremont, G
    Westervelt, HJ
    Javorsky, DJ
    Podolanczuk, A
    Stern, RA
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2002, 16 (04): : 551 - 554
  • [10] Visual information: When we use it influences how we use it
    Heath, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 30 : S2 - S2