Inside Money, Procyclical Leverage, and Banking Catastrophes

被引:6
|
作者
Brummitt, Charles D. [1 ,2 ]
Sethi, Rajiv [3 ,4 ]
Watts, Duncan J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Math, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Complex Sci Ctr, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Econ, Barnard Coll, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA
[5] Microsoft Res, New York, NY USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 08期
关键词
MARKET LIQUIDITY; SYSTEMIC RISK; CONTAGION; CASCADES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0104219
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We explore a model of the interaction between banks and outside investors in which the ability of banks to issue inside money (short-term liabilities believed to be convertible into currency at par) can generate a collapse in asset prices and widespread bank insolvency. The banks and investors share a common belief about the future value of certain long-term assets, but they have different objective functions; changes to this common belief result in portfolio adjustments and trade. Positive belief shocks induce banks to buy risky assets from investors, and the banks finance those purchases by issuing new short-term liabilities. Negative belief shocks induce banks to sell assets in order to reduce their chance of insolvency to a tolerably low level, and they supply more assets at lower prices, which can result in multiple market-clearing prices. A sufficiently severe negative shock causes the set of equilibrium prices to contract (in a manner given by a cusp catastrophe), causing prices to plummet discontinuously and banks to become insolvent. Successive positive and negative shocks of equal magnitude do not cancel; rather, a banking catastrophe can occur even if beliefs simply return to their initial state. Capital requirements can prevent crises by curtailing the expansion of balance sheets when beliefs become more optimistic, but they can also force larger price declines. Emergency asset price supports can be understood as attempts by a central bank to coordinate expectations on an equilibrium with solvency.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Securitized banking, procyclical bank leverage, and financial instability
    Park, Hyun Woong
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2019, 49 : 283 - 300
  • [2] Is the leverage of European banks procyclical?
    Baglioni, A.
    Beccalli, E.
    Boitani, A.
    Monticini, A.
    [J]. EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 45 (03) : 1251 - 1266
  • [3] IS THE LEVERAGE OF TURKISH BANKS PROCYCLICAL?
    Binici, Mahir
    Koksal, Bulent
    [J]. CENTRAL BANK REVIEW, 2012, 12 (02) : 11 - 24
  • [4] Is the leverage of European banks procyclical?
    A. Baglioni
    E. Beccalli
    A. Boitani
    A. Monticini
    [J]. Empirical Economics, 2013, 45 : 1251 - 1266
  • [5] Banking with nominal deposits and inside money
    Skeie, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 2008, 17 (04) : 562 - 584
  • [6] Procyclical Leverage and Value-at-Risk
    Adrian, Tobias
    Shin, Hyun Song
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2014, 27 (02): : 373 - 403
  • [7] Procyclical leverage in Europe and its role in asset pricing
    Baltzer, Markus
    Koehl, Alexandra
    Reitz, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2020, 107
  • [8] Procyclical leverage: Evidence from banks' lending and financing decisions
    Dursun-de Neef, H. Oezlem
    Schandlbauer, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2020, 113
  • [9] MONEY AND BANKING - COMM-MONEY-BANKING
    POTTER, HC
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1958, 48 (05): : 1043 - 1044
  • [10] Erratum to: The contribution of bank regulation and fair value accounting to procyclical leverage
    Amir Amel-Zadeh
    Mary E. Barth
    Wayne R. Landsman
    [J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2017, 22 : 1455 - 1457