Multicomponent interventions for enhancing primary care: a systematic review

被引:9
|
作者
Jimenez, Geronimo [1 ]
Matchar, David [2 ]
Koh, Gerald Choon-Huat [3 ]
Car, Josip [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ Singapore, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Duke NUS Med Sch, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2021年 / 71卷 / 702期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
chronic disease; health services research; healthcare reform; primary health care; systematic review; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; QUALITY-OF-CARE; HOSPITAL USE; GUIDED CARE; PROGRAM; IMPACT; OUTCOMES; ACCESS; MODEL; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp20X714199
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Many countries have implemented interventions to enhance primary care to strengthen their health systems. These programmes vary widely in features included and their impact on outcomes. Aim To identify multiple-feature interventions aimed at enhancing primary care and their effects on measures of system success - that is, population health, healthcare costs and utilisation, patient satisfaction, and provider satisfaction (quadruple-aim outcomes). Design and setting Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Method Electronic, manual, and grey-literature searches were performed for articles describing multicomponent primary care interventions, providing details of their innovation features, relationship to the '4Cs' (first contact, comprehensiveness, coordination, and continuity), and impact on quadruple-aim outcomes. After abstract and full-text screening, articles were selected and their quality appraised. Results were synthesised in a narrative form. Results From 37 included articles, most interventions aimed to improve access, enhance incentives for providers, provide team-based care, and introduce technologies. The most consistent improvements related to increased primary care visits and screening/preventive services, and improved patient and provider satisfaction; mixed results were found for hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and expenditures. The available data were not sufficient to link interventions, achievement of the 4Cs, and outcomes. Conclusion Most analysed interventions improved some aspects of primary care while, simultaneously, producing non-statistically significant impacts, depending on the features of the interventions, the measured outcome(s), and the populations being studied. A critical research gap was revealed, namely, in terms of which intervention features to enhance primary care (alone or in combination) produce the most consistent benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:E10 / E21
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Role of Health Technologies in Multicomponent Primary Care Interventions: Systematic Review
    Jimenez, Geronimo
    Matchar, David
    Koh, Choon Huat Gerald
    van der Kleij, Rianne
    Chavannes, Niels H.
    Car, Josip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (01)
  • [2] Implementability of multicomponent interventions in Primary Care: an overview of systematic reviews
    Renzi, E.
    Covelli, A.
    Abbatecola, G.
    Innocenzio, M.
    Parrinello, E.
    Baccolini, V.
    De Vito, C.
    Marzuillo, C.
    Villari, P.
    Massimi, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [3] Multicomponent Palliative Care Interventions in Advanced Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review
    Phongtankuel, Veerawat
    Meador, Lauren
    Adelman, Ronald D.
    Roberts, Jordan
    Henderson, Charles R., Jr.
    Mehta, Sonal S.
    del Carmen, Tessa
    Reid, M. C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 35 (01): : 173 - 183
  • [4] Interventions Preventing Osteoporosis in Primary Care: A Systematic Review
    Baz, Selma
    Toraman, Aynur Uysal
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (03): : 772 - 782
  • [5] Brief interventions for depression in primary care A systematic review
    McNaughton, Jennifer L.
    [J]. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2009, 55 (08) : 789 - 796
  • [6] Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Interventions: A Systematic Review
    Edwards, Samuel T.
    Peterson, Kim
    Chan, Brian
    Anderson, Johanna
    Helfand, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 (12) : 1377 - 1386
  • [7] Effectiveness of preconception interventions in primary care: a systematic review
    Withanage, Nishadi N.
    Botfield, Jessica
    Srinivasan, Sonia
    Black, Kirsten, I
    Mazza, Danielle
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 72 (725): : E865 - E872
  • [8] The effectiveness of preconception interventions in primary care: a systematic review
    Withanage, Nishadi
    Botfield, Jessica
    Srinivasan, Sonia
    Black, Kirsten
    Mazza, Danielle
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2022, 28 (04) : LXVII - LXVII
  • [9] Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Interventions: A Systematic Review
    Samuel T. Edwards
    Kim Peterson
    Brian Chan
    Johanna Anderson
    Mark Helfand
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2017, 32 : 1377 - 1386
  • [10] Parenting Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care: A Systematic Review
    Smith, Justin D.
    Cruden, Gracelyn H.
    Rojas, Lourdes M.
    Van Ryzin, Mark
    Fu, Emily
    Davis, Matthew M.
    Landsverk, John
    Brown, C. Hendricks
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2020, 146 (01)