共 50 条
Monotherapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for adefovir-resistant vs. entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B: A 5-year clinical trial
被引:34
|作者:
Lim, Young-Suk
[1
]
Gwak, Geum-Youn
[2
]
Choi, Jonggi
[1
]
Lee, Yung Sang
[1
]
Byun, Kwan Soo
[3
]
Kim, Yoon Jun
[4
,5
]
Yoo, Byung Chul
[6
]
Kwon, So Young
[6
]
Lee, Han Chu
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Ulsan, Liver Ctr, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Med, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Liver Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Konkuk Univ, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
基金:
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词:
Adefovir dipivoxil;
Entecavir;
Hepatitis B virus;
Lamivudine;
Resistance;
HBV;
HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA;
VIRUS INFECTION;
ANALOG THERAPY;
LAMIVUDINE;
RISK;
EMTRICITABINE;
ALAFENAMIDE;
DIPIVOXIL;
EFFICACY;
FAILURE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.021
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background & Aims: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy has displayed non-inferior efficacy to TDF plus entecavir (ETV) combination therapy in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) resistant to ETV and/or adefovir (ADV). Nonetheless, the virologic response rate was suboptimal in patients receiving up to 144 weeks of TDF monotherapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of TDF monotherapy given for up to 240 weeks. Methods: One trial enrolled patients with ETV resistance without ADV resistance (n = 90), and another trial included patients with ADV resistance (n = 102). Most patients (91.2%) also had lamivudine resistance. Patients were randomized 1: 1 to receive TDF monotherapy or TDF + ETV combination therapy for 48 weeks, and then TDF monotherapy until week 240. We compared efficacy between the studies and safety in the pooled population at 240 weeks. Results: At week 240, the proportion of patients with serum HBV DNA < 15 IU/ml was not significantly different between the ETV and ADV resistance groups in the full analysis set (84.4% vs. 73.5%; p = 0.07), which was significantly different by on-treatment analysis (92.7% vs. 79.8%; p = 0.02). Virologic blips associated with poor medication adherence occurred in 7 patients throughout the 240 weeks. None developed additional HBV resistance mutations. Among the 170 HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients at baseline, 12 (7.1%) achieved HBeAg seroconversion at week 240. None achieved HBV surface antigen seroclearance. Significant decreases from baseline were observed at week 240 in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (-3.21 ml/min/1.73 m(2) by the CKD-EPI equation, p < 0.001) and bone mineral density (g/cm(2)) at the femur (-2.48%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Up to 240 weeks of TDF monotherapy provided an increasing virologic response rate in heavily pretreated patients with HBV resistant to ETV and/or ADV. However, it was associated with poor serological responses and decreasing renal function and bone mineral density. Lay summary: In patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus resistant to multiple drugs including lamivudine, entecavir, and/or adefovir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy showed non-inferior efficacy compared with the combination therapy of TDF plus entecavir. Nonetheless, short-term TDF monotherapy was associated with suboptimal virologic response, and its long-term safety was uncertain. This study displayed that 240 weeks of TDF monotherapy provided a virologic response in most of those patients, but it was associated with poor serological responses and decreasing renal function and bone mineral density. (C) 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 44
页数:10
相关论文