Influence of rootstock on orchard productivity and fruit quality in peach cv. 'Redhaven'

被引:18
|
作者
Hudina, M.
Fajt, N.
Stampar, F.
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Agron, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Agr & Forestry Inst Nova Gorica, Fruit Growing Ctr, Nova Gorica 5000, Slovenia
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1080/14620316.2006.11512172
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
We have evaluated the influence of four different peach rootstocks (Prunus pumila,'GF 655/2','Missour' and 'GF 677' as a standard) planted in medium-heavy to heavy soil on phenological events (flowering and harvest date), growth, yield, fruit quality and mortality of peach (P. persica L.) scions of cv. 'Redhaven'. At the end of flowering, there were no significant differences between the different rootstocks in the years 1999, 2000, 2003 and 2004. In 2001, trees grafted on P pumila reached the end of flowering 2 d before trees grafted on the other rootstocks. 'Redhaven' fruits ripened on the same day on trees grafted on the different rootstocks. The differences were only between years. The results showed that significantly less vigorous trees, according to their trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) and canopy volume, with the lowest yield, were observed on P pumila rootstock. The rootstock P pumila had a significant negative influence on fruit dimensions and mortality was 50%. Trees grafted on 'GF 655/2' rootstock produced significantly lower yields than those grafted on 'GF 677' or 'Missour' rootstocks. Only the 'GF 655/2' rootstock had root suckers. Trees grafted on 'GF 677' rootstock were significantly more vigorous than on the other rootstocks, and produced the highest yield with good fruit quality. The final canopy volumes of peach trees grafted on the different rootstocks were very different. The most vigorous trees were those grafted on 'GF 677' rootstock, where the final tree volume was 12.8 m(3). Trees grafted on P pumila and 'GF 655/2' had significantly lower TCSA values than on the other rootstocks.
引用
收藏
页码:1064 / 1068
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The rootstock effects on plant adaptability, production, fruit quality, and nutrition in the peach (cv. 'Suncrest')
    Giorgi, M
    Capocasa, F
    Scalzo, J
    Murri, G
    Battino, M
    Mezzetti, B
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2005, 107 (01) : 36 - 42
  • [2] Tergitol as a possible thinning agent for peach cv. Redhaven
    Turk, B. Ambrozic
    Fajt, N.
    Stopar, M.
    HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2014, 41 (02) : 49 - 54
  • [3] Rootstock and fruit canopy position affect peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] (cv. Rich May) plant productivity and fruit sensorial and nutritional quality
    Gullo, Gregorio
    Motisi, Antonio
    Zappia, Rocco
    Dattola, Agostino
    Diamanti, Jacopo
    Mezzetti, Bruno
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2014, 153 : 234 - 242
  • [4] Influence of rootstock on fruit entity, quality and antioxidant properties of fresh apricots (cv. 'Pisana')
    Bartolini, S.
    Leccese, A.
    Iacona, C.
    Andreini, L.
    Viti, R.
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2014, 42 (04) : 265 - 274
  • [5] The Influence of Rootstock and High-Density Planting on Apple cv. Auksis Fruit Quality
    Lauzike, Kristina
    Uselis, Nobertas
    Samuoliene, Giedre
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (06):
  • [6] Effect of rootstock on vigour, orchard productivity and fruit quality of 'Royal Glory' peach (Prunus persica L.)
    Hudina, M.
    IX INTERNATIONAL PEACH SYMPOSIUM, 2021, 1304 : 221 - 228
  • [7] ROOTSTOCK INFLUENCE ON FLOWER BUD HARDINESS AND YIELD OF REDHAVEN PEACH
    DURNER, EF
    HORTSCIENCE, 1990, 25 (02) : 172 - 173
  • [8] INFLUENCE OF FREEZING TEMPERATURE AND ROOTSTOCK ON COLD HARDINESS OF REDHAVEN PEACH
    YADAVA, UL
    HORTSCIENCE, 1988, 23 (03) : 827 - 827
  • [9] ROOTSTOCK INFLUENCE ON SCION PERFORMANCE OF REDHAVEN PEACH ON FOX SAND
    LAYNE, REC
    HORTSCIENCE, 1987, 22 (05) : 1145 - 1145
  • [10] Influence of nitrogen and calcium fertilisation on productivity and fruit quality of the mango cv. sensation
    Torres, MD
    Farré, JM
    Hermoso, JM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL MANGO SYMPOSIUM, 2004, (645): : 395 - 401