Making particularity travel: Trust and citizen science data in Swedish environmental governance

被引:7
|
作者
Kasperowski, Dick [1 ]
Hagen, Niclas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Philosophy Linguist & Theory Sci, Box 200, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
particularity; citizen science; trust; environmental governance; Artportalen; actor-network theory; UNIVERSALITY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1177/03063127221085241
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on how particularities are performed and made to travel through the creation of trust. The Swedish Species Observation System (Artportalen) is one of the largest inscription and calculation centers for citizen data in the world, used extensively by public authorities in Sweden. Observations by members of the public become actionable through environmental governance laws in Sweden. These observations are made through networks of things and humans in which trust is created but unevenly distributed. Important for them to be trusted and to travel are such things as computer software to filter and map observations, red lists, GIS-tools to determine time and place, and validation committees. However, trust is more concentrated in a core set of actors, and there depends on interpersonal relations - though these relations are facilitated by other parts of the epistemic system.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 462
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Trusted Decision-Making: Data Governance for Creating Trust in Data Science Decision Outcomes
    Brous, Paul
    Janssen, Marijn
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (04)
  • [2] Citizen Science and the Politics of Environmental Data
    Kuchinskaya, Olga
    SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2019, 44 (05) : 871 - 880
  • [3] Public participation, trust and data sharing: gardens as hubs for citizen science and environmental health literacy efforts
    Sandhaus, Shana
    Kaufmann, Dorsey
    Ramirez-Andreotta, Monica
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION PART B-COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, 2019, 9 (01): : 54 - 71
  • [4] Science, Data, and the Struggle for Standing in Environmental Governance
    Loring, Philip A.
    Harrison, Hannah L.
    Gaspard, Valencia
    Minnes, Sarah
    Baulch, Helen M.
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2021, 34 (12) : 1584 - 1601
  • [5] Tradeoffs and tools for data quality, privacy, transparency, and trust in citizen science
    Anhalt-Depies, Christine
    Stenglein, Jennifer L.
    Zuckerberg, Benjamin
    Townsend, Philip A.
    Rissman, Adena R.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 238
  • [6] Reputation modelling in Citizen Science for environmental acoustic data analysis
    Yang, HaoFan
    Zhang, Jinglan
    Roe, Paul
    SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING, 2013, 3 (03) : 419 - 435
  • [8] How can bottom-up citizen science restore public trust in environmental governance and sciences? Recommendations from three case studies
    Skarlatidou, Artemis
    Haklay, Muki
    Hoyte, Simon
    van Oudheusden, Michiel
    Bishop, Isabel J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2024, 160
  • [9] Model-Driven Approach for Making Citizen Science Data FAIR
    Luna, Reynaldo Alvarez
    Garrigos, Irene
    Zubcoff, Jose
    Gonzalez-Mora, Cesar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2024, 34 (06) : 891 - 907
  • [10] Citizen surveillance for environmental monitoring: combining the efforts of citizen science and crowdsourcing in a quantitative data framework
    Welvaert, Marijke
    Caley, Peter
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5