共 50 条
Otoacoustic emission suppression in children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder and speech in noise perception deficits
被引:10
|作者:
Iliadou, Vasiliki
[1
]
Weihing, Jeffrey
[2
]
Chermak, Gail D.
[3
]
Bamiou, Doris Eva
[4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Med Sch, PC 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg & Commun Disord, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[3] Washington State Univ Hlth Sci, Elson S Floyd Coll Med, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Spokane, WA USA
[4] UCL, Neurootol Dept, Hosp NHS Trust, London, England
[5] UCL, Ear Inst, London, England
关键词:
Speech perception;
Central auditory processing disorder;
Otoacoustic emissions suppression;
Ear advantage;
Speech recognition in babble;
Auditory processing disorder;
MEDIAL OLIVOCOCHLEAR SYSTEM;
COCHLEAR MICROMECHANICAL PROPERTIES;
RIGHT-EAR ADVANTAGE;
CONTRALATERAL SUPPRESSION;
BRAIN-STEM;
HEARING;
RECOGNITION;
BUNDLE;
ADULTS;
LATERALIZATION;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.05.027
中图分类号:
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号:
100213 ;
摘要:
Objective: The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that medial olivocochlear system functionality is associated with speech recognition in babble performance in children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder. Method: Children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder who specifically demonstrated speech in noise deficits were compared to children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder without these deficits. Suppression effects were examined across 15 time intervals to examine variability. Analysis of right and left ear suppression was performed separately to evaluate laterality. Study sample: 52 children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder, aged 6-14 years were divided into normal or abnormal groups based on SinB performance in each ear. Cut-off value was set at SNR = 1.33 dB. Transient otoacoustic emissions suppression was measured. Results: The abnormal Speech in Babble Right Ear group showed significant negative correlations with suppression levels for 7 of the 15 time intervals measured. No significant correlations with SinBR performance were observed for the remaining time intervals, as was the case for the typically evaluated R8-18 time interval and the Speech in Babble Left Ear. Conclusions: Results indicate that suppression is influenced by the time window analysed, and ear tested, and is associated with speech recognition in babble performance in children with central auditory processing disorder.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 46
页数:8
相关论文