The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists

被引:33
|
作者
Carlton, J. S. [1 ]
Perry-Hill, Rebecca [1 ]
Huber, Matthew [2 ,3 ]
Prokopy, Linda S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, Nat Resources Social Sci Lab, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Earth Sci, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[3] Univ New Hampshire, UNH Inst Study Earth Oceans & Space, Durham, NH 03824 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2015年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
climate change beliefs; cultural values; climate skepticism; NEWSPAPER COVERAGE; SCIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The existence of anthropogenic climate change remains a public controversy despite the consensus among climate scientists. The controversy may be fed by the existence of scientists from other disciplines publicly casting doubt on the validity of climate science. The extent to which non-climate scientists are skeptical of climate science has not been studied via direct survey. Here we report on a survey of biophysical scientists across disciplines at universities in the Big 10 Conference. Most respondents (93.6%) believe that mean temperatures have risen and most (91.9%) believe in an anthropogenic contribution to rising temperatures. Respondents strongly believe that climate science is credible (mean credibility score 6.67/7). Those who disagree about climate change disagree over basic facts (e.g., the effects of CO2 on climate) and have different cultural and political values. These results suggest that scientists who are climate change skeptics are outliers and that the majority of scientists surveyed believe in anthropogenic climate change and that climate science is credible and mature.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Beyond the ivory tower - The scientific consensus on climate change
    Oreskes, N
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5702) : 1686 - 1686
  • [2] Climate change and consensus
    Singer, SF
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1996, 271 (5249) : 581 - 582
  • [3] Consensus on climate change
    Walther, GR
    Hughes, L
    Vitousek, P
    Stenseth, NC
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2005, 20 (12) : 648 - 649
  • [4] Climate change consensus
    Prather, MJ
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1996, 271 (5252) : 1042 - 1043
  • [5] Beyond Counting Climate Consensus
    Pearce, Warren
    Grundmann, Reiner
    Hulme, Mike
    Raman, Sujatha
    Kershaw, Eleanor Hadley
    Tsouvalis, Judith
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2017, 11 (06): : 723 - 730
  • [6] Climate change engagement of scientists
    Dablander, Fabian
    Sachisthal, Maien S. M.
    Cologna, Viktoria
    Strahm, Noel
    Bosshard, Anna
    Gruning, Nana-Maria
    Green, Alison J. K.
    Brick, Cameron
    Aron, Adam R.
    Haslbeck, Jonas M. B.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 14 (10)
  • [7] Climate change: a profile of US climate scientists' perspectives
    Rosenberg, Stacy
    Vedlitz, Arnold
    Cowman, Deborah F.
    Zahran, Sammy
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2010, 101 (3-4) : 311 - 329
  • [8] Climate change: a profile of US climate scientists’ perspectives
    Stacy Rosenberg
    Arnold Vedlitz
    Deborah F. Cowman
    Sammy Zahran
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2010, 101 : 311 - 329
  • [9] Climate scientists not cowed by relentless climate change deniers
    Feder, Toni
    [J]. PHYSICS TODAY, 2012, 65 (02) : 22 - 24
  • [10] Moving beyond scientific agreementAn Editorial comment on “Climate Change: a profile of US climate scientists’ perspectives”
    William R. L. Anderegg
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2010, 101 : 331 - 337