Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from potato production and processing in the Czech Republic

被引:14
|
作者
Moudry, Jan, Jr. [1 ]
Jelinkova, Zuzana [1 ]
Jaresova, Martina [1 ]
Plch, Radek [1 ]
Moudry, Jan [1 ]
Konvalina, Petr [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Bohemia, Fac Agr, Dept Appl Plant Biotechnol, Ceske Budejovice 37005, Czech Republic
关键词
greenhouse gases; potatoes; organic/conventional farming; Life Cycle Assessment; SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.5367/oa.2013.0138
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the impact of selected potato farming and processing activities on the environment in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology was used for this evaluation, and was applied to products cultivated under both conventional and organic production, and processed under technological conditions common in the Czech Republic. Farm questionnaires were supplemented with information from the scientific literature to acquire the necessary data for modelling. The SIMA Pro software and the ReCiPe Midpoint (H) method were used for simulation. The results show a lower level of emissions under organic production (0.126 kg CO(2)e per kg of potatoes, compared with 0.145 kg CO(2)e per kg of conventionally grown potatoes). However, this benefit is cancelled out by higher emissions due to the transportation of organic products over long distances.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 183
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of the consequences of trading in greenhouse gas emissions the Czech Republic
    Rozensky, Ladislav
    Hajek, Miroslav
    Sramkova, Tereza
    Hukal, Petr
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF PUBLIC FINANCE 2018, 2018, : 119 - 129
  • [2] Greenhouse Gas Emission Assessment from Electricity Production in the Czech Republic
    Jursova, Simona
    Burchart-Korol, Dorota
    Pustejovska, Pavlina
    Korol, Jerzy
    Blaut, Agata
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTS, 2018, 5 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [3] Assessing the impact of future greenhouse gas emissions from natural gas production
    Crow, Daniel J. G.
    Balcombe, Paul
    Brandon, Nigel
    Hawkes, Adam D.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 668 : 1242 - 1258
  • [4] Shadow prices of greenhouse gas emissions: An application to the Czech dairy production
    Zakova Kroupova, Zdenka
    Cechura, Lukas
    Havlikova, Michaela
    Halova, Pavlina
    Maly, Michal
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2018, 64 (07): : 291 - 300
  • [5] Assessing the greenhouse gas emissions of Brazilian soybean biodiesel production
    Pellegrino Cerri, Carlos Eduardo
    You, Xin
    Cherubin, Mauricio Roberto
    Moreira, Cindy Silva
    Raucci, Guilherme Silva
    Castigioni, Bruno de Almeida
    Alves, Priscila Aparecida
    Pellegrino Cerri, Domingos Guilherme
    de Castro Mello, Francisco Fujita
    Cerri, Carlos Clemente
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):
  • [6] The emissions of greenhouse gases produced during growing and processing of wheat products in the Czech Republic
    Moudry, Jan, Jr.
    Jelinkova, Zuzana
    Plch, Radek
    Moudry, Jan
    Konvalina, Petr
    Hyspler, Robin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (01): : 1133 - 1136
  • [7] Greenhouse gas emissions projections and mitigation options for the Czech Republic, 1990-2010
    Tichy, M
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1996, 20 : S47 - S55
  • [8] Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from university purchases
    Thurston, Matthew
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 12 (03) : 225 - 235
  • [9] Greenhouse gas inventory of agriculture in the Czech Republic
    Exnerova, Z.
    Cienciala, E.
    [J]. PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 55 (08) : 311 - 319
  • [10] Greenhouse gas emissions in the Czech livestock sector
    Maly, Michal
    Halova, Pavlina
    Havlikova, Michaela
    Kroupova, Zdenka Zakova
    Cechura, Lukas
    [J]. AGRARIAN PERSPECTIVES XXV: GLOBAL AND EUROPEAN CHALLENGES FOR FOOD PRODUCTION, AGRIBUSINESS AND THE RURAL ECONOMY, 2016, : 192 - 199