INFRASTRUCTURE POTENTIAL OF RUSSIAN REGIONS AS A FACTOR OF SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

被引:0
|
作者
Plisetsky, Evgeny L. [1 ]
Plisetsky, Evgeny E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Financial Univ Govt Russian Federat, Dept Econ Theory, 49 Leningrad Av,GSP 3, Moscow 125993, Russia
[2] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Fac Social Sci, Sch Polit & Governance,Dept Terr Dev Management &, 20 Myasnitskaya Str, Moscow 101000, Russia
关键词
infrastructure; infrastructure potential of the territory; assessment; fixed assets; fund saturation of the territory; clustering of regions; new Russian macroregions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study is to develop a methodological approach to assess the infrastructure potential of the territory as a tool for monitoring the effectiveness of the implementation of the state regional policy in the field of infrastructure development. The algorithm for comparative assessment of the infrastructure potential of regions is substantiated in the article. The authors believe that a regular assessment of the level of infrastructure development (infrastructure capacity) of macro-regions and regions subjects of the Russian Federation, along with the monitoring of the achievement of the targets established, should be provided within the framework of implementation approved at the Federal and regional levels, of programmes and plans for infrastructure development. The proposed method of cost estimation of the region's infrastructure potential is based on the use of an integral indicator of the territory's fund saturation, taking into account the qualitative characteristics of the state of fixed assets. The study revealed a significant spatial differentiation of Russian regions in terms of infrastructure potential that helped to group them by the level of its development. The difference between the maximum and minimum values of the infrastructure potential assessment (even without taking into account the federal cities) exceeds 730 times. The cities of federal significance - Moscow, St. Petersburg, Sevastopol, as well as the republics of Crimea and Tatarstan, Krasnodar, Moscow and Kaliningrad regions have the maximum infrastructure potential. The infrastructure potential is evenly decreasing to the East and North of the country. The republics of Tyva, Sakha (Yakutia), Magadan region, and the Chukotka Autonomous Region have the lowest indicators of territory's fund saturation and correspondingly low level of infrastructure potential development. More than a quarter of all Russian regions have a lower level of infrastructure development than the national average. Based on the correlation analysis, it was found that the size of the territory's infrastructure potential has a direct positive impact on the inflow of investments to the regions and the growth of GRP, and therefore is one of the important factors of economic growth and increasing the competitiveness of the regional economy. The results obtained within the study can be applied in the practice of managing the development of territories when forecasting and developing strategies of the socioeconomic development of new macro-regions of Russia, and also used for monitoring the state policy of infrastructure development.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 186
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE RUSSIAN REGIONS
    Kramin, Timur, V
    Klimanova, Albina R.
    TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2019, 17 (02): : 60 - 76
  • [2] DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE RUSSIAN REGIONS
    Eremeeva, E. A.
    Volkova, N. V.
    Khalilova, T., V
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2019, (3-4) : 124 - 131
  • [3] Recreational nature management as a factor for sustainable development of Russian Arctic Regions
    Sevastyanov D.V.
    Korostelev E.M.
    Gavrilov Y.G.
    Karpova A.V.
    Geography and Natural Resources, 2015, 36 (4) : 369 - 374
  • [4] Infrastructure: A basis for sustainable regional development
    Stancioff, Ivan
    Pipeline World, 2004, (3 JUNE): : 5 - 7
  • [5] Assessment of sustainable development of Russian regions
    Klimanov, Vladimir V.
    Kazakova, Sofia M.
    AREA DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY, 2022, 7 (03): : 312 - 334
  • [6] Sustainable development of the Russian Arctic regions
    Didenko, N.
    Skripnuk, D.
    Kikkas, K.
    Seeleva, O.
    ECOSYSTEMS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT X, 2015, 192 : 331 - 341
  • [7] THE IMPACT OF INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL ON REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE: NEW EVIDENCE FROM RUSSIAN REGIONS
    Baskakova, Irina
    Malafeev, Nikita
    SGEM 2016, BK 2: POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL V, 2016, : 769 - 776
  • [8] Directions of Perspective Development of Innovational Infrastructure of Russian Regions
    Alekhina, Larisa L.
    Burtseva, Margarita N.
    Savina, Anna G.
    Ilminskaya, Svetlana A.
    Skobliakova, Irina V.
    FUTURE OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM: DOWNFALL OR HARMONY, 2019, 57 : 219 - 228
  • [9] Regional Inclusive Development: An Assessment of Russian Regions
    Rytova, Elena
    Gutman, Svetlana
    Sousa, Cristina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [10] DIAGNOSTICS OF SOCIAL POTENTIAL REALISATION OF THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC REGIONS FROM THE POSITIONS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
    Gainanov, Damir A.
    Kirillova, Svetlana A.
    Kantor, Olga G.
    TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, 2013, (376): : 132 - +