Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes

被引:343
|
作者
Ismail, K
Winkley, K
Rabe-Hesketh, S
机构
[1] Inst Psychiat, Weston Educ Ctr, Acad Dept Psychol Med, London SE5 9RJ, England
[2] Inst Psychiat, Dept Biostat, London SE5 9RJ, England
来源
LANCET | 2004年 / 363卷 / 9421期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16202-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Adherence difficulties and psychological problems are associated with poor glycaemic control in diabetes. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological therapies to assess their effectiveness in improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to January, 2003. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials that involved people with type 2 diabetes and evaluated a psychological therapy (counselling, cognitive behaviour therapy, or psychodynamic therapy) to improve diabetes control. We extracted the number of participants, their age, duration of diabetes, glycaemic control, type of psychological therapy, its mode of delivery, and type of intervention in the control group. The main outcome was long-term glycaemic control measured by percentage of glycated haemoglobin. Blood glucose concentration, weight, and psychological distress were also measured. Pooled standardised effect sizes were calculated. Findings 25 trials were eligible for the review. In 12 trials, the mean percentage glycated haemoglobin was lower in people assigned a psychological intervention than in the control group (usual care, education, waiting list, or attention control); the pooled mean difference was -0.32 (95% CI -0.57 to -0.07) equivalent to an absolute difference of -0.76%. There were non-significant differences in blood glucose concentration (eight trials; -0.11 [-0.65 to 0.42]) and weight gain (nine trials; 0.37 [-0.18 to 0.93]). Psychological distress was significantly lower in the intervention groups (five trials; -0.58 [-0.95 to -0.20]). Interpretation In type 2 diabetes, there are improvements in long-term glycaemic control and psychological distress but not in weight control or blood glucose concentration in people who receive psychological therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:1589 / 1597
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Winkley, Kirsty
    Landau, Sabine
    Eisler, Ivan
    Ismail, Khalida
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7558): : 65 - 68A
  • [2] Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes
    Winkley, K
    Ismail, K
    [J]. DIABETES, 2005, 54 : A19 - A19
  • [3] A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in adults with Type 2 diabetes
    Winkley, K.
    Upsher, R.
    Stahl, D.
    Pollard, D.
    Gillet, M.
    Brennan, A.
    Heller, S.
    Ismail, K.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2018, 35 : 16 - 16
  • [4] Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in children and adults with type 1 diabetes
    Winkley, K.
    Upsher, R.
    Stahl, D.
    Pollard, D.
    Brennan, A.
    Heller, S.
    Ismail, K.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2020, 37 (05) : 735 - 746
  • [5] Effect of educational interventions on knowledge of the disease and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Shiferaw, Wondimeneh Shibabaw
    Akalu, Tadesse Yirga
    Desta, Melaku
    Kassie, Ayelign Mengesha
    Petrucka, Pammla Margaret
    Aynalem, Yared Asmare
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [6] Telephone follow-up to improve glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials
    Wu, L.
    Forbes, A.
    Griffiths, P.
    Milligan, P.
    While, A.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (11) : 1217 - 1225
  • [7] Intensive glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials
    Hemmingsen, Bianca
    Lund, Soren S.
    Gluud, Christian
    Vaag, Allan
    Almdal, Thomas
    Hemmingsen, Christina
    Wetterslev, Jorn
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343 : 1136
  • [8] Efficacy of bile acid sequestrant treatment for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes - systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hansen, M.
    Sonne, D. P.
    Mikkelsen, K. H.
    Gluud, L. L.
    Vilsboll, T.
    Knop, F. K.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2013, 56 : S67 - S67
  • [9] Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Winkley, Kirsty
    Upsher, Rebecca
    Stahl, Daniel
    Pollard, Daniel
    Brennan, Alan
    Heller, Simon R.
    Ismail, Khalida
    [J]. BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [10] Effects of pistachios on glycaemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hadi, Amir
    Asbaghi, Omid
    Kazemi, Maryam
    Haghighian, Hossein Khadem
    Ghaedi, Ehsan
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2023, 129 (10) : 1693 - 1702