Impact of the Proportion of Biopsy Positive Core in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with Pathological Pt2 and Negative Resection Margin Status after Radical Prostatectomy

被引:5
|
作者
Oikawa, Masaaki [1 ]
Tanaka, Toshikazu [2 ]
Narita, Takuma [3 ]
Noro, Daisuke [4 ]
Iwamura, Hiromichi [5 ]
Tobisawa, Yuki [6 ]
Yoneyama, Tohru [6 ]
Kodama, Hirotake [7 ]
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro [6 ]
Koie, Takuya [8 ]
Ohyama, Chikara [6 ]
机构
[1] Hakodate Municipal Hosp, Dept Urol, Hakodate, Hokkaido 0418680, Japan
[2] Aomori Prefectural Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Aomori 0308553, Japan
[3] Hirosaki Natl Hosp, Dept Urol, Hirosaki, Aomori 0368545, Japan
[4] Mutsu Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Mutsu, Aomori 0358601, Japan
[5] Oyokyo Kidney Res Inst, Dept Urol, Aomori 0380003, Japan
[6] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Hirosaki, Aomori 0368562, Japan
[7] Tsugaru Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Goshogawara 0370074, Japan
[8] Gifu Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Yanagito 1-1, Gifu 5011194, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Organ-confined prostate cancer; Negative surgical margin; Radical prostatectomy; Biochemical recurrence; Proportion of biopsy positive core; Biopsy Gleason score; SURGICAL MARGINS; LYMPHOVASCULAR INVASION; CANCER; SURVIVAL; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s12253-019-00762-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study aimed to determine the prognostic factors associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with pathological T2 (pT2) prostate cancer (PCa) and negative resection margin (RM) status at a single institution. In this retrospective study, we examined 386 patients who were diagnosed with pT2 PCa with negative RM after RP. The length of the tumor was provided for each biopsy core and the overall percentage of PCa was calculated by a pathologist at our institution. We estimated the BCR-free survival (BRFS) in these patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model to determine the risk factors of BCR. The median age of the participants was 68 years, and their initial prostate-specific antigen level was 6.55 ng/mL. The median follow-up period was 85.7 months. The 5-year BRFS rate of the participants was 89.0%. The 5-year BRFS rates were 89.8% in patients with a biopsy Gleason score of 6, 90.4% in those with 7, and 64.1% in those with >= 8 (P = 0.007). The BRFS rate was 93.3% in patients who had a biopsy positive core <= 20% and 82.0% in those who had >= 21% (P = 0.001). Based on the multivariate analysis, the proportion of biopsy positive core was significantly associated with BCR. The proportion of biopsy positive core may predict preoperative covariates in patients with pT2 PCa and negative RM status after RP.
引用
收藏
页码:2115 / 2121
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Variation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer
    Tan, Wei Shen
    Krimphove, Marieke J.
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Marchese, Maya
    Berg, Sebastian
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Loeppenberg, Bjoern
    Nabi, Junaid
    Abdollah, Firas
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    [J]. CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (05) : E1060 - E1068
  • [2] Pathological Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with a Positive Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy
    Bu, L.
    Lucas, E.
    Christie, A.
    Khalil, D.
    Lotan, Y.
    Roehrborn, C.
    Kapur, P.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2014, 94 : 219A - 219A
  • [3] Pathological reappraisal of prostate cancer initially classified as pT2/margin negative after radical prostatectomy
    Fromont, G
    Chambon, E
    Rozet, F
    Cathelineau, X
    Baumert, H
    Vallancien, G
    Validire, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 276 - 276
  • [4] Impact of positive surgical margin status in predicting early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Morizane, Shuichi
    Yumioka, Tetsuya
    Makishima, Karen
    Tsounapi, Panagiota
    Iwamoto, Hideto
    Hikita, Katsuya
    Honda, Masashi
    Umekita, Yoshihisa
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 26 (10) : 1961 - 1967
  • [5] Pathological Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with a Positive Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy
    Bu, L.
    Lucas, E.
    Christie, A.
    Khalil, D.
    Lotan, Y.
    Roehrborn, C.
    Kapur, P.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 27 : 219A - 219A
  • [6] Impact of positive surgical margin status in predicting early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Shuichi Morizane
    Tetsuya Yumioka
    Karen Makishima
    Panagiota Tsounapi
    Hideto Iwamoto
    Katsuya Hikita
    Masashi Honda
    Yoshihisa Umekita
    Atsushi Takenaka
    [J]. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2021, 26 : 1961 - 1967
  • [7] IMPACT OF POSITIVE BLADDER NECK MARGIN ON THE BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Ham, Won Sik
    Kim, Won Tae
    Jeong, Woo Jin
    Lee, Jin Sun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 669 - 669
  • [8] IMPACT OF POSITIVE BLADDER NECK MARGIN ON THE BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Choi, Y. D.
    Ham, W. S.
    Kim, W. T.
    Jeong, W. J.
    Lee, J. S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 281 - 281
  • [9] THE IMPACT OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON BIOCHEMICAL RELAPSE IN PATIENTS WITH PT2 AND PT3 DISEASE
    Schiavina, R.
    Franceschelli, A.
    Brunocilla, E.
    Concetti, S.
    Manferrari, F.
    Bertaccini, A.
    Garofalo, M.
    Borghesi, M.
    Vagnoni, V.
    Baccos, A.
    Rocca, C.
    Pultrone, C.
    Martorana, G.
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (04) : 1479 - 1480
  • [10] The natural course of pT2 prostate cancer with positive surgical margin: predicting biochemical recurrence
    A. Karl
    A. Buchner
    C. Tympner
    T. Kirchner
    U. Ganswindt
    C. Belka
    R. Ganzer
    M. Burger
    F. Eder
    F. Hofstädter
    D. Schilling
    K. Sievert
    A. Stenzl
    M. Scharpf
    F. Fend
    F. vom Dorp
    H. Rübben
    K. Schmid
    D. Porres-Knoblauch
    A. Heidenreich
    B. Hangarter
    R. Knüchel-Clarke
    M. Rogenhofer
    B. Wullich
    A. Hartmann
    E. Comploj
    A. Pycha
    E. Hanspeter
    D. Pehrke
    G. Sauter
    M. Graefen
    C. Stief
    A. Haese
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 : 973 - 979