Occupant Injury Severity and Accident Causes in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (1983-2014)

被引:7
|
作者
Boyd, Douglas D. [1 ]
Macchiarella, Nickolas D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Houston, TX USA
[2] Aeronaut Univ, Embry Riddle Coll Aviat, Daytona Beach, FL USA
关键词
helicopter emergency medical services; injury severity; crashworthiness; air medical services; FATALITY; CRASHES; SAFETY;
D O I
10.3357/AMHP.4446.2016
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) transport critically ill patients to/between emergency care facilities and operate in a hazardous environment: the destination site is often encumbered with obstacles, difficult to visualize at night, and lack instrument approaches for degraded visibility. The study objectives were to determine 1) HEMS accident rates and causes; 2) occupant injury severity profiles; and 3) whether accident aircraft were certified to the more stringent crashworthiness standards implemented two decades ago. METHODS: The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) aviation accident database was used to identify HEMS mishaps for the years spanning 1983-2014. Contingency tables (Pearson Chi-square or Fisher's exact test) were used to determine differences in proportions. A generalized linear model (Poisson distribution) was used to determine if accident rates differed over time. RESULTS: While the HEMS accident rate decreased by 71% across the study period, the fraction of fatal accidents (36-50%) and the injury severity profiles were unchanged. None of the accident aircraft fully satisfied the current crashworthiness standards. Failure to clear obstacles and visual-to-instrument flight, the most frequent accident causes (37 and 26%, respectively), showed a downward trend, whereas accidents ascribed to aircraft malfunction showed an upward trend over time. CONCLUSION: HEMS operators should consider updating their fleet to the current, more stringent crashworthiness standards in an attempt to reduce injury severity. Additionally, toward further mitigating accidents ascribed to inadvertent visual-to-instrument conditions, HEMS aircraft should be avionics-equipped for instrument flight rules flight.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Helicopter Type and Accident Severity in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Missions
    Hinkelbein, Jochen
    Schwalbe, Mandy
    Wetsch, Wolfgang A.
    Spelten, Oliver
    Neuhaus, Christopher
    [J]. AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2011, 82 (12): : 1148 - 1152
  • [2] Helicopter emergency medical services
    Nocera, A
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 : S2 - S2
  • [3] Helicopter emergency medical services accident rates in different international air rescue systems
    Hinkelbein, J.
    Schwalbe, M.
    Genzwuerker, V.
    [J]. OPEN ACCESS EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 2 : 45 - 49
  • [4] RESCUE HELICOPTER SERVICES FOR EMERGENCY TREATMENT AT SCENE OF ACCIDENT
    BRUGGEMANN, H
    TSCHERNE, H
    BEHRENS, S
    POCKLINGTON, P
    [J]. MUNCHENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1977, 119 (35): : 1121 - 1124
  • [5] Comparative effectiveness of helicopter emergency medical services compared to ground emergency medical services
    Galvagno, Samuel M., Jr.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 17 (04):
  • [6] Comparative effectiveness of helicopter emergency medical services compared to ground emergency medical services
    Samuel M Galvagno
    [J]. Critical Care, 17
  • [7] Introduction and characteristics of helicopter emergency medical services
    Choi, Han Joo
    Kim, Hyung Il
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 63 (04): : 188 - 192
  • [8] Helicopter Emergency Medical Services for Trauma: An Update
    Fedeles, Benjamin
    Galvagno, Samuel M.
    [J]. CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2019, 7 (08)
  • [9] Helicopter Emergency Medical Services for Trauma: An Update
    Benjamin Fedeles
    Samuel M. Galvagno
    [J]. Current Surgery Reports, 7
  • [10] Comparison of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) accident rates in different international air rescue systems
    Hinkelbein, J.
    Schwalbe, M.
    Genzwuerker, H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 194 - 194