Microleakage evaluation of roots filled with different obturation techniques and sealers

被引:17
|
作者
Yilmaz, Zeliha [1 ]
Tuncel, Behram [1 ]
Ozdemir, H. Ozgur [1 ]
Serper, Ahmet [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
GUTTA-PERCHA; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; SEALING PROPERTIES; CANAL PREPARATION; DYE PENETRATION; APICAL LEAKAGE; ADHESION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the apical seal of the Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha technique and the lateral compaction technique in combination with 3 sealers (AH-26, Apexit, and Sealite-Ultra). Study design. Seventy extracted single-root teeth were used. Root canals were prepared with ProTaper rotary instruments. Six groups were formed: (I) Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha with AH-26; (II) lateral compaction technique with AH-26; (III) Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha with Apexit; (IV) lateral compaction technique with Apexit; (V) Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha with Sealite-Ultra; and (VI) lateral compaction technique with Sealite-Ultra. The fluid conductance of each specimen was measured after the 7th and 30th days using a fluid filtration method. Results. When lateral compaction was performed, all sealers showed similar levels of leakage (P > .05). Using the single-cone technique, Sealite-Ultra showed more leakage than the others (P < .05). Comparing filling techniques, there was a significant difference only in the Sealite-Ultra groups (P < .05). Conclusion. Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha and lateral compaction techniques showed similar sealing effect. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: 124-128)
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 128
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In Vitro Microleakage Evaluation of Bioceramic and Zinc-Eugenol Sealers with Two Obturation Techniques
    De Angelis, Francesco
    D'Arcangelo, Camillo
    Buonvivere, Matteo
    Argentino, Rachele
    Vadini, Mirco
    COATINGS, 2021, 11 (06)
  • [2] Evaluation of microleakage of roots filled with different techniques with a computerized fluid filtration technique
    Sagsen, Burak
    Er, Ozgar
    Kahraman, Yasemin
    Orucoglu, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2006, 32 (12) : 1168 - 1170
  • [3] Fracture resistance of roots filled with three different obturation techniques
    Topcuoglu, Huseyin-Sinan
    Arslan, Hakan
    Keles, Ali
    Koseoglu, Mustafa
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2012, 17 (03): : E528 - E532
  • [4] Obturation quality of bioceramic sealers with different obturation techniques: a micro-CT evaluation
    Alkahtany, Sarah M.
    Alhussain, Asma A.
    Almthen, Haifa A.
    Aldokhi, Haya D.
    Bukhary, Sundus M.
    Almohaimede, Amal A.
    Alneshmi, Basma
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] Microleakage of Different Root Canal Obturation Techniques
    Devcic, Nevena
    Miletic, Ivana
    Pezelj-Ribaric, Sonja
    Segovic, Sanja
    ACTA STOMATOLOGICA CROATICA, 2005, 39 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [6] A COMPARISON OF APICAL MICROLEAKAGE IN 5 DIFFERENT OBTURATION TECHNIQUES
    KERAMATI, M
    MADISON, S
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 : 344 - 344
  • [7] Resistance to fracture of roots filled with different sealers
    Sagsen, Burak
    Ustun, Yakup
    Pala, Kansad
    Demirbuga, Sezer
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2012, 31 (04) : 528 - 532
  • [8] Comparison of obturation quality in natural and replica teeth root-filled using different sealers and techniques
    Kooanantkul, Chuta
    Shelton, Richard M.
    Camilleri, Josette
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 27 (05) : 2407 - 2417
  • [9] Comparison of obturation quality in natural and replica teeth root-filled using different sealers and techniques
    Chuta Kooanantkul
    Richard M Shelton
    Josette Camilleri
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, 27 : 2407 - 2417
  • [10] Evaluation of the push out of bond strength of different bioceramic root canal sealers with different obturation techniques
    Falakaloglu, Seda
    Gundogar, Mustafa
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI ENDODONZIA, 2022, 36 (01): : 62 - 68