Semantic reliability of multi-agent intelligent systems

被引:2
|
作者
Sundresh, Tippure S.
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bltj.20191
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Generally the concept of reliability has been interpreted as applied to hardware and software and has been based upon the assumption that a system can be decomposed into subsystems or components to which success or failure probabilities can be assigned assuming perfect semantic transactions between them, i.e., with no consideration to variation in the interpretation of the meanings of messages between various components. In multi-agent intelligent systems, where the agents interact with each other in capacities other than merely sending and receiving messages, cooperative decisions are made based upon beliefs, desires, intentions, and the autonomy of individual agents. In such cases, even if the components as well as the interconnections are error-free in the classical sense, there can be serious failures due to semantic variability and consequently the concept of reliability needs to be extended to semantics as well. This paper attempts to establish this new concept of semantic reliability and explore its relationship to the system reliability and information extraction processes. Here we examine the communication between agents and semantic error modes in multi-agent systems using Rao and Georgeff's belief-desire-intention (BDI) model of intelligent agents to decompose the semantic variation into its contributing parts from various subsystems comprising the agents. From this, the impact and the risk management strategies including fault tolerance are evolved. World representation, domain ontologies, and knowledge representation are brought out as important determinants of error control. A fault tolerance design based on goal hierarchy is suggested. (c) 2006 Lucent Technologies Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 236
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-agent intelligent systems
    Krause, LS
    Dean, C
    Lehman, LA
    [J]. ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES FOR SIMULATION SCIENCE VII, 2003, 5091 : 58 - 65
  • [2] Semantic mapping with multi-agent systems
    Li, L
    Wu, BL
    Yang, Y
    [J]. 2005 IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service, Proceedings, 2005, : 54 - 57
  • [3] Decentralized, intelligent multi-agent systems
    Dangelmaier, Wilhelm
    Franke, Hubertus
    Pape, Ulrich
    Rüther, Michael
    [J]. ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 2002, 97 (12): : 640 - 643
  • [4] Multi-Agent Systems for Intelligent Clustering
    Park, Jung-Eun
    Oh, Kyung-Whan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 11, 2006, 11 : 97 - +
  • [5] Semantic Mutation Testing for Multi-agent Systems
    Huang, Zhan
    Alexander, Rob
    [J]. ENGINEERING MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, EMAS 2015, 2015, 9318 : 131 - 152
  • [6] Intelligent Multi-agent based Convergence Systems
    Cho, Young Im
    [J]. 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 2136 - 2141
  • [7] MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS IN INTELLIGENT PERVASIVE SPACES
    Filipe, Joaquim
    [J]. ICISO 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS AND SEMIOTICS IN ORGANISATIONS, 2010, : 9 - 16
  • [8] A Multi-Agent architecture for intelligent gathering systems
    Camacho, D
    Aler, R
    Borrajo, D
    Molina, JM
    [J]. AI COMMUNICATIONS, 2005, 18 (01) : 15 - 32
  • [9] Multi-agent systems reliability, fuzziness, and deterrence
    Rudnianski, M
    Bestougeff, H
    [J]. FORMAL APPROACHES TO AGENT-BASED SYSTEMS, 2005, 3228 : 41 - 56
  • [10] Nondestructive Intervention to Multi-Agent Systems through an Intelligent Agent
    Han, Jing
    Wang, Lin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05):