Backhouse and Boianovsky on "disequilibrium theory". A review article of transforming modern macroeconomics. Exploring disequilibrium microfoundations, 1956-2003

被引：1

作者：

De Vroey, Michel ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Louvain, IRES, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium

来源：

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT | 2014年 / 21卷 / 04期

关键词：

Disequilibrium theory; non-Walrasian equilibrium models; Keynesian macroeconomics; ECONOMICS;

D O I：

10.1080/09672567.2014.916733

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

This article is an in-depth analysis of Backhouse and Boianovsky's book, Transforming Modern Macroeconomics: Exploring Disequilibrium Microfoundations, 1956-2003. I start with questioning Backhouse and Boianovsky's too broad understanding of the disequilibrium approach. Thereby they bring together theories that should be kept separate, those by Patinkin, Clower and Leijonhuvud on the one hand, and those by Barro and Grossman, Dreze and Benassy, on the other. I also substantiate my disagreement with their claim that an inner link exists between fixed price equilibrium theories and imperfect competition modelling. Finally, I put forward a few conjectures about the reason why fixed price modelling petered out.

引用

页码：724 / 742

页数：19