Is laparoscopic approach for pancreatic insulinomas safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:35
|
作者
Su, An-Ping [1 ]
Ke, Neng-Wen [1 ]
Zhang, Yi [1 ]
Liu, Xu-Bao [1 ]
Hu, Wei-Ming [1 ]
Tian, Bo-Le [1 ]
Zhang, Zhao-Da [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliopancreat Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Provinc, Peoples R China
关键词
Pancreatic insulinoma; Laparoscopy; Open surgery; Pancreatic fistula; ISLET-CELL TUMORS; SINGLE-INSTITUTION; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; SOLITARY INSULINOMA; RESECTION; EXPERIENCE; SURGERY; LOCALIZATION; ENUCLEATION; NEOPLASMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.051
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: No consensus exists as to whether laparoscopic treatment for pancreatic insulinomas (PIs) is safe and feasible. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of laparoscopic approach (LA) for PIs. The abovementioned approach is also compared with open surgery. Methods: A systematic literature search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Science Citation Index, and Ovid journals) was performed to identify relevant articles. Articles that compare the use of LA and open approach to treat PI published on or before April 30, 2013, were included in the meta-analysis. The evaluated end points were operative outcomes, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications. Results: Seven observational clinical studies that recruited a total of 452 patients were included. The rates of conversion from LA to open surgery ranged from 0%-41.3%. The meta-analysis revealed that LA for PIs is associated with reduced length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -5.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.11 to -4.16; P < 0.00001). No significant difference was observed between LA and open surgery in terms of operation time (weighted mean difference, 2.57; 95% CI, -10.91 to 16.05; P = 0.71), postoperative mortality, overall morbidity (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35-1.17; P = 0.14], incidence of pancreatic fistula (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.51-1.44; P = 0.56), and recurrence of hyperglycemia (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.41-7.95; P = 0.43). Conclusions: Laparoscopic treatment for PIs is a safe and feasible approach associated with reduction in length of hospital stay and comparable rates of postoperative complications in relation with open surgery. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 134
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How Good Is EUS to Detect Pancreatic Insulinomas? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    Bechtold, Matthew L.
    Reddy, Jyotsna Bk
    Bapoje, Srinivas R.
    Antillon, Mainor R.
    Brugge, William R.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB247 - AB247
  • [2] Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alberto Arezzo
    Gitana Scozzari
    Federico Famiglietti
    Roberto Passera
    Mario Morino
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 2293 - 2304
  • [3] Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arezzo, Alberto
    Scozzari, Gitana
    Famiglietti, Federico
    Passera, Roberto
    Morino, Mario
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (07): : 2293 - 2304
  • [4] Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection in Octogenarian Patients Is it Safe? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Minghao
    Qin, Huabo
    Luo, Qianxin
    He, Xiaosheng
    Lan, Ping
    Lian, Lei
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (42) : e1765
  • [5] Systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic pancreatic resections for neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs)
    Tamburrino, Domenico
    Partelli, Stefano
    Renzi, Claudio
    Crippa, Stefano
    Muffatti, Francesca
    Perali, Carolina
    Parisi, Amilcare
    Randolph, Justus
    Fusai, Giuseppe Kito
    Cirocchi, Roberto
    Falconi, Massimo
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 11 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [6] Endoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Treatment for Pancreatic Pseudocysts A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hao, Wenzhen
    Chen, Yunli
    Jiang, Yu
    Yang, Aiming
    PANCREAS, 2021, 50 (06) : 788 - 795
  • [7] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complications in Transvaginal Approach in Laparoscopic Surgery
    Komorowski, Andrzej L.
    Alba Mesa, Francisco
    Bala, Malgorzata M.
    Mitus, Jerzy W.
    Wysocki, Wojciech M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S853 - S862
  • [8] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complications in Transvaginal Approach in Laparoscopic Surgery
    Andrzej L. Komorowski
    Francisco Alba Mesa
    Małgorzata M. Bała
    Jerzy W. Mituś
    Wojciech M. Wysocki
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2015, 77 : 853 - 862
  • [9] Venous Resection for Pancreatic Cancer, a Safe and Feasible Option? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zwart, E. S.
    Yilmaz, B. S.
    Halimi, A.
    Ahola, R.
    Kurlinkus, B.
    Laukkarinen, J.
    Ceyhan, G. O.
    PANCREAS, 2020, 49 (10) : 1442 - 1442
  • [10] Laparoscopic versus open pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Ke
    Pan, Yu
    Zhang, Bin
    Maher, Hendi
    Cai, Xiu-jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 53 : 243 - 256