Refining a measure of brain injury sequelae to predict postacute rehabilitation outcome: Rating scale analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory

被引:67
|
作者
Malec, JF
Moessner, AM
Kragness, M
Lezak, MD
机构
[1] Mayo Med Ctr, TBI Model Syst, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Neurol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
brain injury; Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory; rating scale analysis;
D O I
10.1097/00001199-200002000-00006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Evaluate the psychometric properties of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI). Design: Rating scale (Rasch) analysis of MPAI and principal component analysis of residuals; the predictive validity of the MPAI measures and raw scores was assessed in a sample from a day rehabilitation program. Setting: Outpatient brain injury rehabilitation. Participants: 305 persons with brain injury. Results: A 22-item scale reflecting severity of sequelae of brain injury that contained a mix of indicators of impairment, activity, and participation was identified. Scores and measures for MPAI scales were strongly correlated and their predictive validities were comparable. Conclusions: Impairment, activity, and participation define a single dimension of brain injury sequelae. The MPAI shows promise as a measure of this construct.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 682
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] The Italian version of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4. A new measure of brain injury outcome
    Cattelani, R.
    Corsini, D.
    Posteraro, L.
    Agosti, M.
    Saccavini, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2009, 45 (04) : 513 - 519
  • [2] Clinical use of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in rehabilitation after paediatric acquired brain injury
    Oddson, Bruce
    Rumney, Peter
    Johnson, Patricia
    Thomas-Stonell, Nancy
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2006, 48 (11): : 918 - 922
  • [3] Outcome prediction in home- and community-based brain injury rehabilitation using the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory
    Malec, James F.
    Parrot, Devan
    Altman, Irwin M.
    Swick, Shannon
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 25 (05) : 663 - 676
  • [4] Functional Validity of Selected Screening Measures Using the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 in Traumatic Postacute Brain Injury Rehabilitation Center
    Figueroa, Maritza
    Thompson, Shannon
    Johnson, Andrea
    Bailey, Cynthia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2013, 28 (05) : E38 - E39
  • [5] Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory: Comparing Psychometrics in Cerebrovascular Accident to Traumatic Brain Injury
    Malec, James F.
    Kean, Jacob
    Altman, Irwin M.
    Swick, Shannon
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (12): : 2271 - 2275
  • [6] Factor analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory: Structure and validity
    Bohac, DL
    Malec, JF
    Moessner, AM
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 1997, 11 (07) : 469 - 482
  • [7] Ecological Validity of the Screening Module and the Daily Living Tests of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Using the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 in Postacute Brain Injury Rehabilitation
    Zgaljardic, Dennis J.
    Yancy, Sybil
    Temple, Richard O.
    Watford, Monica F.
    Miller, Rebekah
    [J]. REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 56 (04) : 359 - 365
  • [8] Validation of the French-Canadian Adaptation of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in an Adult Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Rehabilitation Setting
    Guerrette, Marie-Claude
    McKerral, Michelle
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2019, 33 : 50 - 50
  • [9] Comparability of Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory ratings by staff, significant others and people with acquired brain injury
    Malec, JF
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2004, 18 (06) : 563 - 575
  • [10] Predicting outcomes on admission to residential rehabilitation with the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory: 'Truth or dare?'
    Ramos, Sara da Silva
    Copstick, Susan
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2016, 30 (5-6) : 688 - 688