Effect of M1a and M1b Category in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

被引:12
|
作者
Kennecke, Hagen [1 ]
Yu, Jason [2 ]
Gill, Sharlene [1 ]
Cheung, Winson Y. [1 ]
Blanke, Charles D. [3 ,4 ]
Speers, Caroline [5 ]
Woods, Ryan [6 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Div Med Oncol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Div Med Oncol, Juravinski Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Knight Canc Inst, Div Med Oncol, Portland, OR USA
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
[5] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Breast & Gastrointestinal Canc Outcomes Unit, Canc Surveillance & Outcomes, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[6] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Canc Control Res, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
来源
ONCOLOGIST | 2014年 / 19卷 / 07期
关键词
Metastatic colorectal cancer; Prognostic factors; M1a; M1b; PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS; SURGICAL RESECTION; NATURAL-HISTORY; FOLLOW-UP; LIVER; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; CHEMOTHERAPY; PATTERNS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0442
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. In 2009, the American Joint Committee on Cancer version 7 staging system introduced the M1 sub-classifications M1a (single metastatic site) and M1b (peritoneal or multiple metastatic sites). The study objectives were to evaluate the prognostic effect of site of metastasis and M1a/b category among patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer and synchronous metastasis. Patients and Methods. Patients with newly diagnosed pathologic or clinical category M1 colorectal cancer referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency between 1999 and 2007 were included. Demographic, tumor, treatment, and outcome data were prospectively collected, and prognostic factors were identified. Univariate Cox models were used to assess the prognostic impact of individual sites of metastasis and to determine the effect of M1a/b category on overall survival (OS). Results. Among 2,049 eligible patients, 70% had M1a and 30% M1b category disease. The most common sites of common single sites of metastasis included liver (56%), lung (5.3%), and peritoneum (3.6%). Metastasis to a single organ or site, including peritoneum, was associated with improved OS compared with multiple sites of metastasis. In multivariate analysis, M1b category conferred inferior survival and hazard ratio (HR) 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22, 1.55), along with age >70 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3-4. Resection of primary tumor was associated with improved survival, HR0.46(95% CI: 0.41, 0.52). Results were similar in subgroup analysis of patients undergoing resection of their primary tumor when histology, tumor, and node category were included. Conclusion. The results lend support to the introduction of M1a/b colorectal cancer categories. Consideration may be given to classifying patients with solitary peritoneal metastasis only as M1a rather than M1b category. Further refinement of category M1a to reflect resectability of metastasis at initial diagnosis may improve prognostication.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 726
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of M1a and M1b staging in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Kennecke, Hagen F.
    Yu, Jason
    Gill, Sharlene
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    Blanke, Charles Davic
    Cheifetz, Rona
    Woods, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [2] Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas could be classified into M1a and M1b category by the number of metastatic organs
    Feng, Fang
    Cai, Wei
    Wang, Gaoming
    Chen, Weigang
    Yang, Haochang
    Sun, Mingyu
    Zhou, Li
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [3] Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas could be classified into M1a and M1b category by the number of metastatic organs
    Fang Feng
    Wei Cai
    Gaoming Wang
    Weigang Chen
    Haochang Yang
    Mingyu Sun
    Li Zhou
    BMC Gastroenterology, 20
  • [4] M1A/M1B esophageal carcinoma: Clinical relevance
    Christie, NA
    Rice, TW
    DeCamp, MM
    Goldblum, JR
    Adelstein, DJ
    Zuccaro, G
    Rybicki, LA
    Blackstone, EH
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 118 (05): : 900 - 906
  • [5] Treatment of M1a/M1b prostate cancer with or without radical prostatectomy at diagnosis
    Moschini, M.
    Morlacco, A.
    Kwon, E.
    Rangel, L. J.
    Karnes, R. J.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2017, 20 (01) : 117 - 121
  • [6] Treatment of M1a/M1b prostate cancer with or without radical prostatectomy at diagnosis
    M Moschini
    A Morlacco
    E Kwon
    L J Rangel
    R J Karnes
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2017, 20 : 117 - 121
  • [7] M1a/M1b esophageal carcinoma: Clinical relevance - Discussion
    Krasna, MJ
    Orringer, MB
    Lerut, AEMR
    Reed, CE
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 118 (05): : 906 - 907
  • [8] Non-small cell lung cancer: Are M1a and M1b the same stage?
    Dias, Margarida
    Coutinho, Daniel
    Linhas, Rita
    Campainha, Sergio
    Conde, Sara
    Antunes, Ana
    Barroso, Ana
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 46
  • [9] Prognosis after surgical resection of M1a/M1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Shim, YM
    Choi, YS
    Kim, K
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 20 (02) : 229 - 231
  • [10] RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY IN M1A AND LOW VOLUME M1B PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS: AN INDIRECT COMPARISON WITH THE STAMPEDE TRIAL ARM H
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Pfister, David
    Shariat, Shahrokh
    Grubmuller, Bernhard
    Motterle, Giovanni
    Devos, Gaetan
    Robesti, Daniele
    Scalvi, Filippo
    Fallara, Giuseppe
    Pellegrino, Antony
    Berghen, Charlien
    Everaerts, Wouter
    Fossati, Nicola
    Scuderi, Simone
    Martini, Alberto
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Joniau, Steve
    Karnes, Jeffrey
    Briganti, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E364 - E364