Calcineurin inhibitor avoidance with daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone in DR-matched de novo kidney transplant recipients

被引:40
|
作者
Asberg, Anders [1 ]
Midtvedt, Karsten
Line, Pal D.
Narverud, Janicke
Holdaas, Hallvard
Jenssen, Trond
Reisaeter, Anna V.
Johnsen, Linda F.
Fauchald, Per
Hartmann, Anders
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Biosci, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Rikshosp, Dept Med, Lab Renal Physiol, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Rikshosp, Dept Surg, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
关键词
avoidance; calcineurin; kidney;
D O I
10.1097/01.tp.0000225803.04995.2b
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimens posttransplantation have been claimed to conserve graft function in addition to reduce the risk factors for cardiovascular and malignant disease in renal transplant recipients. Methods. The primary aim of this prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, single-center study was to compare the effect of complete CNI-avoidance posttransplant (daclizumab + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisolone: Dac-group, n = 27) with the standard CNI-based immunosuppressive protocol at our transplant unit (cyclosporine A + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisolone: CsA-group, n = 27) on renal function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] determined as plasma clearance of Cr-51-EDTA) in a selected low immunogenic risk population (DR-matched, PRA-negative de novo cadaveric transplant recipients). Results. There were no significant difference in GFR at week 10 (P = 0.61), but GFR was significantly (P = 0.029) lower in the Dac-group (52 +/- 20 ml/min) at month 12 than in the CsA-group (69 +/- 29 ml/min). One-year patient and graft survival did not differ between the two groups. Overall acute rejection rate was 70.4% (19/27) in the Dac-group and 29.6% (8/27) in the CsA-group (P = 0.006). Conclusions. The strategy to select DR-matched, PRA-negative de novo cadaveric transplant recipients for a CNI-avoidance protocol was not successful. The incidence of acute rejection was unacceptable high even though anti-CD25 antibody induction as well as initial higher mycophenolate mofetil doses (3 g/day) were applied, and renal function was significantly lower in the CNI-avoidance patients at 1 year. Other strategies need to be examined for avoidance of CNI's in the early posttransplant period.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Calcineurin inhibitor-avoidance with daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone in DR matched de novo kidney transplant recipients
    Asberg, Anders
    Midtvedt, Karsten
    Line, Pal Dag
    Narverud, Janicke
    Holdaas, Hallvard
    Jenssen, Trond
    Reisaeter, Anna V.
    Johnsen, Linda F.
    Fauchald, Per
    Hartmann, Anders
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 21 : 264 - 264
  • [2] Economic evaluation of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine and prednisolone in de novo renal transplant recipients
    Holmes, M
    Chilcott, J
    Walters, S
    Whitby, S
    Akehurst, R
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 17 (04) : 182 - 187
  • [3] THE TRANSFORM STUDY: INFECTION OUTCOMES WITH EVEROLIMUS PLUS REDUCED CALCINEURIN INHIBITOR AND MYCOPHENOLATE PLUS STANDARD CALCINEURIN INHIBITOR REGIMENS IN DE NOVO KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Pernin, V.
    Buchler, M.
    Cruzado, J.
    Garcia, V.
    Kuypers, D.
    Citterio, F.
    Huynh-Do, U.
    Luo, W. L.
    Bernhardt, P.
    Sommerer, C.
    Gharbi, H.
    Vincenti, F.
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 32 : 23 - 23
  • [4] Daclizumab induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as an immunosuppression regimen for primary kidney transplant recipients
    Ciancio, G
    Burke, GW
    Suzart, K
    Roth, D
    Kupin, W
    Rosen, A
    Olson, L
    Esquenazi, V
    Miller, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (07) : 1100 - 1106
  • [5] Therapeutic equivalence of mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients
    Salvadori, M
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) : 3245 - 3247
  • [6] The TRANSFORM Study: Infection Outcomes with Everolimus Plus Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor and Mycophenolate Plus Standard Calcineurin Inhibitor Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients.
    Vincenti, F.
    Cruzado, J.
    Mulgaonkar, S.
    Garcia, V.
    Kuypers, D.
    Buchler, M.
    Citterio, F.
    Huynh-Do, U.
    Luo, W-L.
    Bernhardt, P.
    Sommerer, C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 : 258 - 258
  • [7] Impact of Sirolimus versus Mycophenolate Mofetil on Kidney Function after Calcineurin Inhibitor Dose Reduction in Liver Transplant Recipients
    Chiang, Heng-Yi
    Li, Lung-Chih
    Hsu, Chien-Ning
    Lin, Chih-Che
    Chan, Yi-Chia
    Wang, Chih-Chi
    Chen, Chao-Long
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICALS, 2023, 16 (08)
  • [8] Daclizumab induction for primary kidney transplant recipients using tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids as maintenance immunosuppression
    Ciancio, G
    Miller, A
    Burke, GW
    Gharagozloo, H
    Rosen, A
    Roth, D
    Kupin, W
    Pinna, A
    Cespedes, M
    Esquenazi, V
    Miller, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1013 - 1014
  • [9] Two-dose daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid-free regimen in de novo cardiac transplant recipients: Early experience
    Mastrobuoni, S.
    Ubilla, M.
    Cordero, A.
    Herreros, J.
    Rabago, G.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (07) : 2163 - 2166
  • [10] Sotrastaurin in Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Regimen Using Everolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Tedesco-Silva, H.
    Kho, M. M. L.
    Hartmann, A.
    Vitko, S.
    Russ, G.
    Rostaing, L.
    Budde, K.
    Campistol, J. M.
    Eris, J.
    Krishnan, I.
    Gopalakrishnan, U.
    Klupp, J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 (07) : 1757 - 1768