Cross-country comparisons of efficiency: Evidence from the UK and Italian investment firms

被引:24
|
作者
Beccalli, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Accounting & Finance Dept, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
investment firms; cross-country comparison; cost efficiency; profitability;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4266(03)00123-7
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper compares and reconciles two new methods for cross-country comparisons of the cost efficiency of UK and Italian investment firms over the period 1995-1998. It employs four different specifications of the stochastic frontier methodology, using a translog cost function in order to measure X-efficiency. The traditional common frontier reveals that Italian investment firms are nearly as efficient as UK firms. To overcome traditional limitations, two methods are used in this paper. They provide consistent results. The first method shows differences between the efficiency of the two countries by incorporating environmental variables into the cross-country common frontier. The second method shows differences in the efficiency of the domestic versus foreign investment firms in the two countries, by testing the ability to monitor and control on a cross-border basis. Finally, to identify investment firms that are both cost and profit efficient, we undertake a profitability test. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1363 / 1383
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Credit information sharing and investment efficiency: Cross-country evidence
    Hou, Fangfang
    Mengistu, Muhabie Mekonnen
    Ng, Jeffrey
    Zhang, Janus Jian
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [2] Cross-country comparisons
    Turkson, JK
    Redlinger, RY
    [J]. POWER SECTOR REFORM IN SUBSAHARAN AFRICAN, 1999, : 186 - 203
  • [3] Does cross-listing in the US improve investment efficiency? Evidence from UK firms
    Abdallah, Abed AL-Nasser
    Abdallah, Wissam
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2019, 72 : 215 - 231
  • [4] Taxation and Bank Efficiency: Cross-Country Evidence
    Gaganis, Chrysovalantis
    Pasiouras, Fotios
    Tsaklanganos, Angelos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMICS OF BUSINESS, 2013, 20 (02) : 229 - 244
  • [5] Carbon risk and corporate investment: A cross-country evidence
    Dinh Hoang Bach Phan
    Vuong Thao Tran
    Ming, Tee Chwee
    Anh Le
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 46
  • [6] The Development of Electromobility in the European Union: Evidence from Poland and Cross-Country Comparisons
    Luszczyk, Marcin
    Sulich, Adam
    Siuta-Tokarska, Barbara
    Zema, Tomasz
    Thier, Agnieszka
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [7] Determinant factors on ethical behavior of firms: evidence from a cross-country survey
    Cristina Bota-Avram
    Roumen Vesselinov
    Paula Ramona Răchişan
    Adrian Groşanu
    [J]. SN Business & Economics, 2 (8):
  • [8] R&D investment and institutions: Evidence from Cross-country data
    Deng, Haibin
    Liao, Jinzhong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK MANAGEMENT & GLOBAL E-BUSINESS, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 815 - 820
  • [9] Cross-country comparisons of technical efficiency of health production: a demonstration of pitfalls
    Spinks, Jean
    Hollingsworth, Bruce
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2009, 41 (04) : 417 - 427
  • [10] Cross-Country Comparisons of Disability and Morbidity: Evidence from the Gateway to Global Aging Data
    Lee, Jinkook
    Phillips, Drystan
    Wilkens, Jenny
    Chien, Sandy
    Lin, Yu-Chen
    Angrisani, Marco
    Crimmins, Eileen
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 73 (11): : 1519 - 1524