Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model

被引:73
|
作者
Lucas, Margarida [1 ]
Gunawardena, Charlotte [2 ]
Moreira, Antonio [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Digital Contents Lab, Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Univ New Mexico, Org Learning & Instruct Technol Program, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[3] Univ Aveiro, Dept Educ, Res Ctr Didact & Technol Teacher Educ CIDTFF, Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
Human-computer interaction; Social knowledge construction; Asynchronous discussions; Interaction analysis model; Content analysis; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; ROLE ASSIGNMENT; IMPACT; ROLES; TEACHERS; PATTERNS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The growing adoption of communication technologies to mediate teaching and learning processes fostered the study of asynchronous communication as an activity that can reveal students' behavior during learning processes. Much of the research conducted on this topic focuses on the application of interaction models to analyze the content of asynchronous discussions and assess their quality. Despite the existence of different models, the one developed by Gunawardena, Lowe, and Anderson (1997) remains as one of the most used in the study of online interaction. In this respect, the present work focuses on studies that mention the application of this model in its analysis and discusses the extension of its application as well as its limitations. Results reinforce the adequacy of the model to analyze knowledge construction in different types of communication tools, but they also suggest the need to look at how learning is orchestrated and the importance of re-defining some aspects of the model in question. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 582
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing
    Gunawardena, CN
    Lowe, CA
    Anderson, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 1997, 17 (04) : 397 - 431
  • [2] Analysis of Social Network and Knowledge Construction Levels in Online Discussion
    Zhao, Chengling
    Liang, Yunzhen
    Liu, Qingtang
    Zhao, Xiaoyuan
    [J]. FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION THROUGH TECHNOLOGY (EITT 2016), 2016, : 163 - 167
  • [3] Assessing knowledge construction in online learning communities
    Derry, SJ
    DuRussel, LA
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: OPEN LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: NEW COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES TO SUPPORT LEARNING, EXPLORATION AND COLLABORATION, 1999, 50 : 431 - 438
  • [4] Using social network analysis to study the interaction patterns in an online knowledge community
    Heath, A
    [J]. ASIST 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 65TH ASIST ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 39, 2002, 2002, 39 : 566 - 567
  • [5] A critique of knowledge management: using a social constructionist model
    McAdam, R
    McCreedy, S
    [J]. NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT, 2000, 15 (02) : 155 - 168
  • [6] BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF KNOWLEDGE
    GUERIN, B
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1992, 47 (11) : 1423 - 1432
  • [7] Deep Learning Models for Analyzing Social Construction of Knowledge Online
    Gunawardena, Charlotte N.
    Chen, Yan
    Flor, Nick
    [J]. ONLINE LEARNING, 2023, 27 (04): : 69 - 92
  • [8] An interaction analysis model to study knowledge construction in interprofessional education: proof of concept
    Floren, Leslie Carstensen
    ten Cate, Olle
    Irby, David M.
    O'Brien, Bridget C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2021, 35 (05) : 736 - 743
  • [9] The Effective interaction model construction of Distance online Learning
    Xiao Tianqing
    Li Qiong
    Wang Yan
    Yang Yahe
    [J]. 2011 AASRI CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (AASRI-ITED 2011), VOL 2, 2011, : 43 - 46
  • [10] Influence of Emotional Interaction on Learners' Knowledge Construction in Online Collaboration Mode
    Wen, Liqin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2022, 17 (02) : 76 - 92