Space debris: Assessing risk and responsibility

被引:25
|
作者
Bradley, Andrew M. [2 ]
Wein, Lawrence M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Inst Computat & Math Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Space debris; Low Earth orbit; Mitigation; Antisatellite weapon test; MITIGATION; ISSUES; EVOLUTION; SCIENCE; LEGEND; ORBIT; MODEL; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2009.02.006
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
We model the orbital debris environment by a set of differential equations with parameter values that capture many of the complexities of existing three-dimensional simulation models. We compute the probability that a spacecraft gets destroyed in a collision during its operational lifetime, and then define the sustainable risk level as the maximum of this probability over all future time. Focusing on the 900- to 1000-km altitude region, which is the most congested portion of low Earth orbit, we find that - despite the initial rise in the level of fragments - the sustainable risk remains below 10(-3) if there is high (>98%) compliance to the existing 25-year postmission deorbiting guideline. We quantify the damage (via the number of future destroyed operational spacecraft) generated by past and future space activities. We estimate that the 2007 FengYun 1C antisatellite weapon test represents approximate to 1% of the legacy damage due to space objects having a characteristic size of >= 10 cm, and causes the same damage as failing to deorbit 2.6 spacecraft after their operational life. Although the political and economic issues are daunting, these damage estimates can be used to help determine one-time legacy fees and fees on future activities (including deorbit noncompliance), which can deter future debris generation, compensate operational spacecraft that are destroyed in future collisions, and partially fund research and development into space debris mitigation technologies. Our results need to be confirmed with a high-fidelity three-dimensional model before they can provide the basis for any major decisions made by the space community. (C) 2009 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1372 / 1390
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing meteoroid and space debris risks
    Lee, AL
    19TH SPACE SIMULATION CONFERENCE: COST EFFECTIVE TESTING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, 1996, 3341 : 241 - 247
  • [2] State Accountability for Space Debris: A Legal Study of Responsibility for Polluting the Space Environment and Liability for Damage Caused by Space Debris
    Smith, Lesley Jane
    AIR & SPACE LAW, 2019, 44 (01): : 121 - 123
  • [3] Space debris puts exploration at risk
    Greenbaum, Dov
    SCIENCE, 2020, 370 (6519) : 922 - 922
  • [4] Approaches to assessing spacecraft survival in the space debris environment
    Ratliff, JM
    Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Space Debris, 2005, 587 : 713 - 716
  • [5] Assessing the Debris Risk from the Avalanche of CubeSats
    Swartwout, Michael
    2016 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2016,
  • [6] The environmental responsibility of states for space debris and the implications for developing countries in Africa
    Ferreira-Snyman, Anel
    COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN AFRICA-CILSA, 2013, 46 (01): : 19 - 51
  • [7] Analysis of the space debris impacts risk on the International Space Station
    Valsecchi, GB
    Rossi, A
    CELESTIAL MECHANICS & DYNAMICAL ASTRONOMY, 2002, 83 (1-4): : 63 - 76
  • [8] Analysis of the Space Debris Impacts Risk on the International Space Station
    G. B. Valsecchi
    A. Rossi
    Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2002, 83 : 63 - 76
  • [9] Responsibility for assessing the risk of spread of Schmallenberg virus
    Roger, Paul
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2012, 171 (03) : 77 - 77
  • [10] Sharing the responsibility for assessing the risk of the driver with dementia
    Rapoport, Mark J.
    Herrmann, Nathan
    Molnar, Frank J.
    Man-Son-Hing, Malcolm
    Marshall, Shawn C.
    Shulman, Ken
    Naglie, Gary
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2007, 177 (06) : 599 - 601