Verification of Software Applications for Evaluating Interlaboratory Comparison Results

被引:3
|
作者
Acko, Bojan [1 ]
Brezovnik, Simon [1 ]
Sluban, Boris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maribor, Fac Mech Engn, SLO-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
关键词
Traceability; software; interlaboratory comparison; verification; data sets;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.231
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
One of the main tasks of the international metrology system is to assure comparability of measurement results. It can be achieved through recognized traceability chains, which are linking measurement results to references such as measurement units and their realizations. However, the traceability is most commonly limited to measurement instruments and standards of measurement. Since modern measurement applications often use complex software for calculating final results from experimental data, it is very important that all computational links are recognized explicitly and known to be operating correctly. In order to introduce a traceability chain into metrology computation, European project EMRP NEW 06 TraCIM was agreed between EC and European metrology association Euramet. One of the tasks of the project is also to establish random datasets and validation algorithms for verifying software applications for evaluating interlaboratory comparison results. The aims and theoretical approaches of this task are presented in this paper. Background normative documents, calculated statistical parameters, boundary conditions for creating reference data sets, as well as customer interface are described. The verification application will be available on the project web page after finishing the project. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 272
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visualisation of interlaboratory comparison results in PomPlots
    Yana Spasova
    Stefaan Pommé
    Uwe Wätjen
    [J]. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2007, 12 : 623 - 627
  • [2] Evaluating Automated Software Verification Tools
    Prause, Christian R.
    Gerlich, Rainer
    Gerlich, Ralf
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE TESTING, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION (ICST), 2018, : 343 - 353
  • [3] Visualisation of interlaboratory comparison results in PomPlots
    Spasova, Yana
    Pomme, Stefaan
    Waetjen, Uwe
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2007, 12 (12) : 623 - 627
  • [4] REPORTING ONGOING RESULTS OF INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAMS
    VIGGERS, EA
    ATKINSON, J
    PURCELL, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 76 (03) : 620 - 631
  • [5] Chlorophyll-a determination: results of an interlaboratory comparison
    Petra Schilling
    Martin Powilleit
    Steffen Uhlig
    [J]. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2006, 11 : 462 - 469
  • [6] Chlorophyll-a determination:: results of an interlaboratory comparison
    Schilling, Petra
    Powilleit, Martin
    Uhlig, Steffen
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2006, 11 (8-9) : 462 - 469
  • [8] Role and evaluation of interlaboratory comparison results in laboratory accreditation
    Bode, P.
    [J]. NUCLEAR PROFICIENCY TESTING, 2008, 1036 : 29 - 37
  • [9] RESULTS FROM RADIONUCLIDE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON IN SEDIMENT AND FISH
    Pantelic, Gordana
    Vancsura, Peter
    Nikolic, Jelena Krneta
    Jankovic, Marija
    Sarap, Natasa
    Todorovic, Dragana
    Rajacic, Milica
    [J]. RAD 2015: THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RADIATION AND APPLICATIONS IN VARIOUS FIELDS OF RESEARCH, 2015, : 129 - 132
  • [10] INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON OF RECEPTOR MODEL RESULTS FOR HOUSTON AEROSOL
    DZUBAY, TG
    STEVENS, RK
    BALFOUR, WD
    WILLIAMSON, HJ
    COOPER, JA
    CORE, JE
    DECESAR, RT
    CRUTCHER, ER
    DATTNER, SL
    DAVIS, BL
    HEISLER, SL
    SHAH, JJ
    HOPKE, PK
    JOHNSON, DL
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1984, 18 (08) : 1555 - 1566