Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:42
|
作者
De Silva, Kushan [1 ]
Lee, Wai Kit [1 ]
Forbes, Andrew [2 ]
Demmer, Ryan T. [3 ,4 ]
Barton, Christopher [5 ]
Enticott, Joanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Monash Ctr Hlth Res & Implementat, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Biostat Unit,Div Res Methodol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY USA
[5] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Sch Primary & Allied Hlth Care, Dept Gen Practice, Notting Hill, Vic, Australia
关键词
Diabetes mellitus; Type; 2; Diagnosis; Prognosis; Machine learning; Meta-Analysis; DIAGNOSIS; PROGNOSIS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104268
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: We aimed to identify machine learning (ML) models for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) prediction in community settings and determine their predictive performance. Method: Systematic review of ML predictive modelling studies in 13 databases since 2009 was conducted. Primary outcomes included metrics of discrimination, calibration, and classification. Secondary outcomes included important variables, level of validation, and intended use of models. Meta-analysis of c-indices, subgroup analyses, meta-regression, publication bias assessments and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Twenty-three studies (40 prediction models) were included. Studies with high-, moderate-, and lowrisk of bias were 3, 14, and 6 respectively. All studies conducted internal validation whereas none conducted external validation of their models. Twenty studies provided classification metrics to varying extents whereas only 7 studies performed model calibration. Eighteen studies reported information on both the variables used for model development and the feature importance. Twelve studies highlighted potential applicability of their models for T2DM screening. Meta-analysis produced a good pooled c-index (0.812). Sources of heterogeneity were identified through subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Issues pertaining to methodological quality and reporting were observed. Conclusions: We found evidence of good performance of ML models for T2DM prediction in the community. Improvements to methodology, reporting and validation are needed before they can be used at scale.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    De Silva, Ranakombu Kushan Kumara
    Enticott, Joanne
    Barton, Christopher
    Forbes, Andrew
    Saha, Sajal Kumar
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2019, 25 (03) : XXVIII - XXIX
  • [2] Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
    De Silva, Kushan
    Enticott, Joanne
    Barton, Christopher
    Forbes, Andrew
    Saha, Sajal
    Nikam, Rujuta
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2021, 7
  • [3] Accuracy of Machine Learning Classification Models for the Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Survey and Meta-Analysis Approach
    Olusanya, Micheal O.
    Ogunsakin, Ropo Ebenezer
    Ghai, Meenu
    Adeleke, Matthew Adekunle
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [4] Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Qi
    Wang, Xinglei
    Pei, Juhong
    Wu, Yinping
    Guo, Qiang
    Su, Yujie
    Yan, Hui
    Nan, Ruiling
    Chen, Haixia
    Dou, Xinman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 23 (10) : 1655 - +
  • [5] Machine learning prediction models for diabetic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Lianqin
    Shao, Xian
    Yu, Pei
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2024, 84 (03) : 890 - 902
  • [6] Opium use and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Piraiee, Elahe
    Hassanipour, Soheil
    Shojaie, Layla
    Vali, Mohebat
    Nikbakht, Hossein-Ali
    Rezaei, Fatemeh
    Ghaem, Haleh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE, 2022, 27 (05) : 452 - 458
  • [7] Clinical Prediction Models for Heart Failure Hospitalization in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Razaghizad, Amir
    Oulousian, Emily
    Randhawa, Varinder Kaur
    Ferreira, Joao Pedro
    Brophy, James M.
    Greene, Stephen J.
    Guida, Julian
    Felker, G. Michael
    Fudim, Marat
    Tsoukas, Michael
    Peters, Tricia M.
    Mavrakanas, Thomas A.
    Giannetti, Nadia
    Ezekowitz, Justin
    Sharma, Abhinav
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2022, 11 (10):
  • [8] Machine Learning Models for Blood Glucose Level Prediction in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Kui
    Li, Linyi
    Ma, Yifei
    Jiang, Jun
    Liu, Zhenhua
    Ye, Zichen
    Liu, Shuang
    Pu, Chen
    Chen, Changsheng
    Wan, Yi
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 11
  • [9] Early prediction of ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning models: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance
    Frondelius, Tuomas
    Atkova, Irina
    Miettunen, Jouko
    Rello, Jordi
    Vesty, Gillian
    Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn
    Jansson, Miia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 121 : 76 - 87
  • [10] Machine Learning Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Zheqing
    Yang, Luqian
    Han, Wentao
    Wu, Yaoyu
    Zhang, Linhui
    Gao, Chun
    Jiang, Kui
    Liu, Yun
    Wu, Huiqun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03)