共 50 条
A randomised phase II study of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed plus erlotinib as second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
被引:23
|作者:
Dittrich, Christian
[1
,2
]
Papai-Szekely, Zsolt
[3
]
Vinolas, Nuria
[4
]
Sederholm, Christer
[5
]
Hartmann, Joerg T.
[6
,7
]
Behringer, Dirk
[8
]
Kazeem, Gbenga
[9
]
Desaiah, Durisala
[10
]
Leschinger, Monika I.
[11
]
von Pawel, Joachim
[12
]
机构:
[1] Kaiser Franz Josef Spital, LBI ACR VIEnna, A-1100 Vienna, Austria
[2] Kaiser Franz Josef Spital, ACR ITR VIEnna, A-1100 Vienna, Austria
[3] St George Hosp Fejer Cty, Szekesfehervar, Hungary
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Linkoping Univ Hosp, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[6] Dept Internal Med II Hematol & Med Oncol, Kiel, Germany
[7] Catholic Hosp Consortium Ostwestfalen, Bielefeld, Germany
[8] Clin Hematol & Oncol, Bochum, Germany
[9] Eli Lilly UK, Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, Surrey, England
[10] Eli Lilly Corp Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[11] Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany
[12] Asklepios Hosp Munchen Gauting, Gauting, Germany
关键词:
Non-small cell lung cancer;
Non-squamous;
Second-line therapy;
Pemetrexed;
Erlotinib;
CHEMOTHERAPY;
DOCETAXEL;
TRIAL;
COMBINATION;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ejca.2014.03.007
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Introduction: Pemetrexed and erlotinib have been approved as second-line monotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel phase II study assessed efficacy and safety of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed + erlotinib in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: NSCLC stage III-IV patients who failed one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, >= 1 measurable lesion by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <= 2 were eligible. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) with vitamin B-12 and folic acid q3w alone or combined with erlotinib 150 mg daily. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTTF), response and toxicity. Results: Of 165 randomised non-squamous patients, 159 were treated (pemetrexed: 83; pemetrexed + erlotinib: 76). The median PFS (months; 95% CI) was 2.89 (1.94, 3.38) for pemetrexed versus 3.19 (2.86, 4.70) for pemetrexed + erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI: (0.44, 0.90); P = 0.0047). The median OS (months; 95% CI) was 7.75 (5.29, 10.41) for pemetrexed versus 11.83 (8.18, 16.66) for pemetrexed + erlotinib (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.98; P = 0.019). The median TTTF (months: 95% CI) was 2.4 (1.74, 2.99) for pemetrexed versus 3.0 (2.23, 4.07) for pemetrexed + erlotinib (HR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.89; P = 0.0034). One patient died in pemetrexed + erlotinib arm due to febrile neutropenia. Grades 3/4 drug-related toxicities (in >= 5% of patients) in pemetrexed/pemetrexed + erlotinib were febrile neutropenia (2.4%/10.5%), diarrhoea (1.2%/5.3%), rash (1.2%/9.2%); anaemia (6%/11.8%), leukopenia (9.6%/23.7%), neutropenia (9.6%/25.0%), and thrombocytopenia (4.8%/14.5%). Conclusions: Pemetrexed + erlotinib treatment significantly improved PFS, OS and TTTF in 2nd line non-squamous NSCLC and was associated with an increase in grade 3/4 toxicities compared with pemetrexed alone. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1571 / 1580
页数:10
相关论文