Statistical Modeling of Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Using OSHA Data

被引:14
|
作者
Lee, Derrick G. [1 ,2 ]
Lavoue, Jerome [3 ,4 ]
Spinelli, John J. [1 ,2 ]
Burstyn, Igor [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Canc Control Res, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal Hosp Res Ctr CRCHUM, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Drexel Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Drexel Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
standard industrial classification; exposure assessment; threshold limit value; mixed-effect modeling; predictive probability model; occupational exposure; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; North American industry classification system; occupational safety and health administration; permissible exposure limit; BERYLLIUM EXPOSURE; WORKERS; INDUSTRIES; DATABASES; CANCER; URINE; LEVEL; AIR; PAH;
D O I
10.1080/15459624.2015.1043049
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of pollutants with multiple variants classified as carcinogenic. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) provided access to two PAH exposure databanks of United States workplace compliance testing data collected between 1979 and 2010. Mixed-effects logistic models were used to predict the exceedance fraction (EF), i.e., the probability of exceeding OSHA's Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL = 0.2mg/m(3)) for PAHs based on industry and occupation. Measurements of coal tar pitch volatiles were used as a surrogate for PAHs. Time, databank, occupation, and industry were included as fixed-effects while an identifier for the compliance inspection number was included as a random effect. Analyses involved 2,509 full-shift personal measurements. Results showed that the majority of industries had an estimated EF < 0.5, although several industries, including Standardized Industry Classification codes 1623 (Water, Sewer, Pipeline, and Communication and Powerline Construction), 1711 (Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning), 2824 (Manmade Organic Fibres), 3496 (Misc. Fabricated Wire products), and 5812 (Eating Places), and Major group's 13 (Oil and Gas Extraction) and 30 (Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastic Products), were estimated to have more than an 80% likelihood of exceeding the PEL. There was an inverse temporal trend of exceeding the PEL, with lower risk in most recent years, albeit not statistically significant. Similar results were shown when incorporating occupation, but varied depending on the occupation as the majority of industries predicted at the administrative level, e.g., managers, had an estimated EF < 0.5 while at the minimally skilled/laborer level there was a substantial increase in the estimated EF. These statistical models allow the prediction of PAH exposure risk through individual occupational histories and will be used to create a job-exposure matrix for use in a population-based case-control study exploring PAH exposure and breast cancer risk.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 742
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Occupational Exposure to Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons at a Coke Plant
    Bieniek, Grazyna
    Lusiak, Agnieszka
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2012, 56 (07): : 796 - 807
  • [2] Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Wood Dust
    Huynh, C. K.
    Schuepfer, P.
    Boiteux, P.
    [J]. INHALED PARTICLES X, 2009, 151
  • [3] New biomarkers of occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
    Seidel, Albrecht
    Spickenheuer, Anne
    Straif, Kurt
    Rihs, Hans-Peter
    Marczynski, Boleslaw
    Scherenberg, Michael
    Dettbarn, Gerhard
    Angerer, Juergen
    Wilhelm, Michael
    Bruening, Thomas
    Jacob, Juergen
    Pesch, Beate
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, 2008, 71 (11-12): : 734 - 745
  • [4] An assessment of occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the UK
    Unwin, John
    Cocker, John
    Scobbie, Emma
    Chambers, Helen
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2006, 50 (04): : 395 - 403
  • [5] Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Wood Dust
    Huynh, C. K.
    Schuepfer, P.
    Boiteux, P.
    [J]. INHALED PARTICLES X, 2009, 151
  • [6] Occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by firefighters
    Akhtar, U. S.
    Keir, J. L.
    Matschke, D.
    White, P.
    Blais, J. M.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 259 : S211 - S211
  • [7] Dose-response modeling of occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with biomarkers of exposure and effect
    Pesch, Beate
    Kappler, Martin
    Straif, Kurt
    Marczynski, Boleslaw
    Preuss, Ralf
    Robbach, Bernd
    Rihs, Hans-Peter
    Weiss, Tobias
    Rabstein, Sylvia
    Pierl, Christiane
    Scherenberg, Michael
    Adams, Ansgar
    Kaefferlein, Heiko Udo
    Angerer, Juergen
    Wilhelm, Michael
    Seidel, Albrecht
    Bruening, Thomas
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2007, 16 (09) : 1863 - 1873
  • [8] From diseases to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons occupational exposure traceability
    Nisse, C.
    Lepage, N.
    [J]. ARCHIVES DES MALADIES PROFESSIONNELLES ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT, 2010, 71 (03) : 512 - 515
  • [9] Environmental confounding factors to occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
    Lyubomirova, K.
    Popov, T.
    Panev, T.
    Chohadzieva, D.
    Vitcheva, V.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 164 : S184 - S185
  • [10] Occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of prostate cancer
    Barul, Christine
    Parent, Marie-Elise
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 20 (01)