Changing climate risk in the UK: A multi-sectoral analysis using policy-relevant indicators

被引:50
|
作者
Arnell, N. W. [1 ]
Kay, A. L. [2 ]
Freeman, A. [1 ]
Rudd, A. C. [2 ]
Lowe, J. A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Reading, Berks, England
[2] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol UKCEH, Wallingford, Oxon, England
[3] Met Off, Hadley Ctr, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Priestley Int Ctr Climate, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Climate risk; Heatwaves; Floods; Droughts; Wildfire; Adaptation; Resilience; UKCP18; REGIONAL-VARIATIONS; UNITED-KINGDOM; IMPACTS; DROUGHT; PROJECTIONS; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; WEATHER; INDEXES; BRITAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.crm.2020.100265
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a consistent series of policy-relevant indicators of changing climate hazards and resources for the UK, spanning the health, transport, energy, agriculture, flood and water sectors and based on UKCP18 climate projections. In the absence of explicit adaptation, risks will increase across the whole of the UK, but at different rates and from different starting values in different regions. The likelihood of heat extremes affecting health, the road and rail network and crop growth will increase very markedly. Agricultural and hydrological drought risks increase across the UK, as does wildfire danger. River flood risk increases particularly in the north and west. Demand for cooling energy will increase, but demand for heating energy will decline. Crop growing degree days will increase, benefiting the production of perennial crops. In general, the risks associated with high temperature extremes will increase the most in warmer southern and eastern England, but the rate of increase from a lower base may be greater further north and west. Reducing emissions reduces risks in the long term but has little effect over the next two or three decades. The results provide evidence to support the development of national and local climate and resilience policy. Measures to enhance resilience are needed alongside policies to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Resilience policy should recognise the variability in change in risk across the UK, and therefore different local priorities. Explicit choices need to be made about 'worst case' emissions scenarios as they can influence strongly estimated changes in risk: the increase in risk with RCP8.5 can be considerably higher than with a pathway reaching 4 degrees C by 2100.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the UK
    Holman, IP
    Nicholls, RJ
    Berry, PM
    Harrison, PA
    Audsley, E
    Shackley, S
    Rounsevell, MDA
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2005, 71 (1-2) : 43 - 73
  • [2] AN ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC POLICIES IN ROMANIA USING A MULTI-SECTORAL DSGE MODEL
    Caraiani, Petre
    [J]. METALURGIA INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 14 (04): : 63 - 68
  • [3] Analysis of recycling activities using multi-sectoral economic model with material flow
    Masui, T
    Morita, T
    Kyogoku, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2000, 122 (02) : 405 - 415
  • [4] Analysis of alcohol policy in Nigeria: multi-sectoral action and the integration of the WHO "best-buy" interventions
    Abiona, Opeyemi
    Oluwasanu, Mojisola
    Oladepo, Oladimeji
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [5] Analysis of alcohol policy in Nigeria: multi-sectoral action and the integration of the WHO “best-buy” interventions
    Opeyemi Abiona
    Mojisola Oluwasanu
    Oladimeji Oladepo
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 19
  • [6] Induced technological change in a multi-regional, multi-sectoral, integrated assessment model (WIAGEM) Impact assessment of climate policy strategies
    Kemfert, C
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 54 (2-3) : 293 - 305
  • [7] A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the UK: Part I. Methodology
    Holman I.P.
    Rounsevell M.D.A.
    Shackley S.
    Harrison P.A.
    Nicholls R.J.
    Berry P.M.
    Audsley E.
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2005, 71 (1-2) : 9 - 41
  • [8] Sensitivity of Nutrition Indicators to Measure the Impact of a Multi-Sectoral Intervention: Cross-Sectional, Household, and Individual Level Analysis
    Marshak, Anastasia
    Young, Helen
    Radday, Anne
    Naumova, Elena N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (09)
  • [9] Multi-Sectoral Approach to Noncommunicable Disease Prevention Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis
    Sanni, Saliyou
    Wisdom, Jennifer P.
    Ayo-Yusuf, Olalekan A.
    Hongoro, Charles
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 2019, 49 (02): : 371 - 392
  • [10] Comparative Analysis Of Various Multi-Sectoral HPHT Diamonds Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
    Lebedev, V. F.
    Bulyga, D. V.
    Koliadin, A. V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE LASER OPTICS 2020 (ICLO 2020), 2020,