New methods to improve the safety assessment of cryopreserved ovarian tissue for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients

被引:14
|
作者
Rodriguez-Iglesias, Beatriz [1 ,2 ]
Novella-Maestre, Edurne [2 ,3 ]
Herraiz, Sonia [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Diaz-Garcia, Cesar [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Pellicer, Nuria [4 ]
Pellicer, Antonio [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Med, Dept Pediat Obstet & Ginecol, Valencia, Spain
[2] Inst Invest Sanitario La Fe, Grp Invest Med Reprod, Valencia, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ & Politecn La Fe, Unidad Genet, Valencia, Spain
[4] Univ Valencia, INCLIVA, Fdn IVI, Valencia, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ & Politecn La Fe, Area Salud Mujer, Unidad Preservac Fertilidad, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Breast cancer; GCDFP15; MGB1; ovarian cortex cryopreservation; SBEM; NY-BR-1 PROTEIN EXPRESSION; MALIGNANT-CELLS; TRANSPLANTATION; RISK; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; PREGNANCY; CORTEX; STAGE; RESTORATION; METASTASIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a novel molecular panel of markers to detect breast cancer (BC) disseminated malignant cells in ovarian tissue, and to improve the safety of ovarian tissue transplantation. Design: Experimental study. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Ten ovarian biopsies from healthy patients, 13 biopsies with diagnosed BC metastasis, and 4 biopsies from primary BC tumor for designing a diagnostic panel of BC cell contamination; 60 ovarian biopsies from BC patients undergoing fertility preservation for validating the panel. Animal(s): Female nude mice. Intervention(s): A novel panel for BC malignant cell detection by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), inmmunohistochemical analysis, in vitro invasion assay and xenotransplantation assayed in ovarian tissue from BC patients. Main Outcome Measure(s): Expression of GCDFP15, MGB1, SBEM, MUC1, WT-1, and NY-BR-01, selected as markers, assessed by quantitative RT-PCR in samples with confirmed BC metastasis. The most sensitive markers were confirmed by immunohistochemistry, and tested in vitro and in vivo. Result(s): GCDFP15, MGB1, and SBEM were the most sensitive and specific markers to detect BC metastatic cells when at least one was expressed by quantitative RT-PCR. The panel was validated in 60 patients and confirmed in an in vitro invasion assay, where no invasive cells were observed. Samples negative for BC cells cannot develop disease when xenografted. Conclusion(s): GCDFP15, MGB1, and SBEM were the most sensitive molecules to create a diagnostic panel for BC malignant cell contamination, which may make ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation a safe technique for fertility preservation in BC patients. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1493 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue - effective method of fertility preservation in cancer patients
    Gamzatova, Zaynab
    Komlichenko, Eduard
    Kostareva, Anna
    Galagudza, Mikhail
    Ulrikh, Elena
    Zubareva, Tatiana
    Sheveleva, Tatiana
    Nezhentseva, Elena
    Kalinina, Evgenia
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 : 43 - 47
  • [2] Fertility Preservation in Patients With Breast Cancer: Necessity, Methods, and Safety
    Waks, Adrienne G.
    Partridge, Ann H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2016, 14 (03): : 355 - 363
  • [3] Safety assessment of cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation in breast cancer patients by molecular techniques and in vivo study
    Rodriguez-Iglesias, B.
    Novella-Maestre, E.
    Pellicer, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 313 - 314
  • [4] Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: time to stop?
    Macklon, Kirsten Tryde
    De Vos, Michel
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 49 (01)
  • [5] Use of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in the Danish fertility preservation cohort
    Kristensen, Stine Gry
    Wakimoto, Yu
    Colmorn, Lotte Berdiin
    Dueholm, Margit
    Pors, Susanne Elisabeth
    Macklon, Kirsten Tryde
    Mamsen, Linn Salto
    Nikiforov, Dmitry
    Cadenas, Jesus
    Greve, Vinnie Hornshoj
    Bjorn, Anne-Mette Bay
    Rosendahl, Mikkel
    Pedersen, Anette Tonnes
    Andersen, Anders Nyboe
    Fedder, Jens
    Ernst, Erik
    Andersen, Claus Yding
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (04) : 1098 - 1106
  • [6] The role of menstrual cycle phase and AMH levels in young breast cancer patients whose ovarian tissue was cryopreserved for fertility preservation.
    Takae, S.
    Sugihita, Y.
    Yoshioka, N.
    Nakajima, M.
    Nishijima, C.
    Iwahata, H.
    Horage, Y.
    Kawamura, K.
    Suzuki, N.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 329 - 330
  • [7] PRESERVATION OF FERTILITY IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER: IS SAFETY POSSIBLE?
    Wunder-Galie, Dorothea
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 : 9 - 9
  • [8] Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue for fertility preservation: no evidence of malignant cell contamination in ovarian tissue from patients with breast cancer
    Rosendahl, Mikkel
    Wielenga, Vera Timmermans
    Nedergaard, Lotte
    Kristensen, Stine Gry
    Ernst, Erik
    Rasmussen, Per Emil
    Anderson, Michael
    Schmidt, Kirsten Tryde
    Andersen, Claus Yding
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (06) : 2158 - 2161
  • [9] New insights for fertility preservation by ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation in pediatric cancer patients
    Herraiz, Sonia
    Cervello, Irene
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (06) : 1191 - 1191
  • [10] Cancer and fertility preservation: fertility preservation in breast cancer patients
    Maltaris, Theodoros
    Weigel, Michael
    Mueller, Andreas
    Schmidt, Marcus
    Seufert, Rudolf
    Fischl, Franz
    Koelbl, Heinz
    Dittrich, Ralf
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (02):