Comparative Evaluation of Simultaneous Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation and Implant Placement with Residual Bone Heights Greater or Less than 5 mm

被引:12
|
作者
Soydan, Sidika Sinem [1 ]
Cubuk, Secil [1 ]
Bayrak, Burcu [2 ]
Uckan, Sina [1 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Selcuk Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Konya, Turkey
关键词
atrophic maxilla; lateral sinus elevation; one-stage sinus elevation; sinus floor augmentation; sinus floor elevation; FOLLOW-UP; POSTERIOR MAXILLA; AUTOGENOUS BONE; BOVINE BONE; AUGMENTATION; OSTEOTOME; CRESTAL; GRAFTS; LIFT;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.3614
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Implants can be inserted simultaneously during sinus floor elevation (SFE), or 6 months later, for posterior maxillary rehabilitation. The residual bone height (RBH) is a major factor that affects the type of surgical procedure that will be performed. The aim of this study was to compare the survival rates of implants inserted during one-stage SFE with two different RBHs (< 5 mm and >= 5 mm). Materials and Methods: This study consisted of implants inserted into an RBH of either < 5 mm or >= 5 mm, and the survival of the implants was assessed according to the clinical symptoms of the patients: pain or tenderness during function (or spontaneously), mobility, depth of probing, exudation history, and radiographic bone loss at the final follow-up appointment. The survival rates of the two groups were statistically compared using the Fisher exact test. Results: Fifty-nine consecutive patients (29 women and 30 men) undergoing a onestage sinus elevation procedure simultaneously with implant insertion were included in this study. Fifty-one implants were placed in the study group (RBH: 1 to 4.9 mm), and 31 implants were placed in the control group (RBH: 5 to 8 mm). The survival rate of the implants in the study group was 94.2% at the 5.4-year follow-up and 95.8% in the control group at the 7.9-year follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the implant survival rate (P = .785). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that SFE with simultaneous implant placement in patients with an RBH < 5 mm can be accomplished, and that the survival rate is similar to that of the one-stage SFE protocol with an RBH of > 5 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 183
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extraction of an Impacted Residual Root Adjacent to a Maxillary Sinus With Sinus Floor Elevation for Implant Placement: A Simultaneous Approach
    Ueno, Daisuke
    Isoda, Yukimori
    Watanabe, Goro
    Sobue, Takanori
    Sato, Junichi
    [J]. CLINICAL ADVANCES IN PERIODONTICS, 2014, 4 (01): : 43 - 48
  • [2] Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus and simultaneous implant placement in patients with 3 to 5 mm of residual alveolar bone height
    Peleg, M
    Mazor, Z
    Garg, AK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1999, 14 (04) : 549 - 556
  • [3] PIEZOELECTRIC SURGERY IN MAXILLARY SINUS FLOOR ELEVATION WITH HYDRAULIC PRESSURE FOR XENOGRAFT AND SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT
    Li, Juanjuan
    Lee, Kyungmo
    Chen, Haohua
    Ou, Guomin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 110 (05): : 344 - 348
  • [4] Evaluation of crestal sinus floor elevation in cases exhibiting an oblique sinus floor with a residual bone height of 4.0–7.0 mm using Densah burs with simultaneous implant placement: a prospective clinical study
    Mahmoud Shalash
    Mohamed Mounir
    Tala Elbanna
    [J]. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9
  • [5] Evaluation of crestal sinus floor elevation in cases exhibiting an oblique sinus floor with a residual bone height of 4.0-7.0 mm using Densah burs with simultaneous implant placement: a prospective clinical study
    Shalash, Mahmoud
    Mounir, Mohamed
    Elbanna, Tala
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [6] Modified transcrestal sinus floor elevation with concomitant implant placement in edentulous posterior maxillae with residual bone height of 5 mm or less: a non-controlled prospective study
    Xu, H.
    Wen, J.
    Liu, C.
    Shuai, X.
    Zhang, X.
    Kang, N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (04) : 495 - 502
  • [7] Fabricating a surgical template for guiding sinus floor elevation in the maxillary sinus septa with simultaneous implant placement: A dental technique
    Wang, Tingting
    Ye, Lijuan
    Sun, Yuanyuan
    Wu, Yiqun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 129 (06): : 840 - 843
  • [8] Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach through Circular Window with a Diameter of 5 to 6 mm for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation with Simultaneous Implant Placement: Retrospective Study
    Lee, Sang-Woon
    Park, Young-Wook
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (17):
  • [9] Maxillary Sinus-Floor Elevation with Nanoporous Biphasic Bone Graft Material for Early Implant Placement
    Mertens, Christian
    Wiens, Daniel
    Steveling, Helmut G.
    Sander, Anja
    Freier, Kolja
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (03) : 365 - 373
  • [10] Repositioning of the bone window in lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement: A retrospective radiographic study
    Wang, Zhikang
    Zhang, Jing
    Ren, Lingfei
    Yang, Guoli
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (08) : 816 - 833