Preoperative MRT of the breast in invasive lobular carcinoma in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma

被引:15
|
作者
Diekmann, F
Diekmann, S
Beljavskaja, M
Bick, U
Taupitz, M
Blohmer, JU
Winzer, KJ
Hamm, B
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Charite Berlin, Inst Radiol, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Klinikum Charite, Klin & Poliklin Gynakol & Geburtshilfe, Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Charite, Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany
关键词
MRI; invasive lobular; invasive ductal; breast carcinoma;
D O I
10.1055/s-2004-813011
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the role of preoperative MRI of the breast in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Materials and Methods: For one year, all patients transferred by the hospital's gynecologic outpatient service for suspicious findings in routine mammography and/or ultrasound (conventional modalities = CM) underwent preoperative MRI of the breast. Retrospective analysis of the histologic findings identified 17 patients with ILC. These were compared with 30 proven IDC patients, chosen by random. The MRI findings of these 2 patient groups were compared with regard to the detection of additional lesions. The average number of additional lesions detected by MRI was compared for significant differences between both groups using the T-test for paired samples. Results: In the 17 patients with ILC, conventional modalities (CM) identified 21 malignant lesions whereas MRI detected a total of 30 lesions. At least one additional lesion was detected by MRI in 7 of the 17 patients with ILC. In the 30 patients with IDC, on the other hand, MRI detected an additional lesion in three instances only. In one patient of the ILC group, MRI identified an additional lesion in the contralateral breast that had escaped detection by CM. No additional contralateral lesion was detected by MRI in any of the IDC patients. Benefit of MRI in ILC-Group: The mean numbers of detected malignant lesions differed significantly between diagnosis by MRI and CM in the ILC group (1.77 carcinomas per patient with MRI versus 1.24 with conventional modalities, T-test, p = 0.0078). Benefit of MRI in IDC-Group: although it was possible to find 1.27 carcinomas vs. 1.17 carcinomas per patient in the IDC-Group, this benefit was not statistical significant (T-test, p = 0.0831). Conclusion: Preoperative MRI detects multiple additional lesions compared to the ones already known by CM. The higher incidence of multiple lesions in ILC compared to IDC and the difficult diagnosis of ILC in CM might be the reason for the fact that preoperative MRI is particularly useful in patients with ILC.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 549
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the clinicopathological features of invasive ductal, invasive lobular, and mixed (invasive ductal + invasive lobular) carcinoma of the breast
    Baha Zengel
    Ulkem Yararbas
    Ali Duran
    Adam Uslu
    Nukhet Elıyatkın
    Mehmet Ali Demırkıran
    Fevzi Cengiz
    Cenk Şimşek
    Hakan Postacı
    Enver Vardar
    Raika Durusoy
    [J]. Breast Cancer, 2015, 22 : 374 - 381
  • [2] Invasive ductal carcinoma with lobular features: a comparison study to invasive ductal and invasive lobular carcinomas of the breast
    David P. Arps
    Patrick Healy
    Lili Zhao
    Celina G. Kleer
    Judy C. Pang
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2013, 138 : 719 - 726
  • [3] Invasive ductal carcinoma with lobular features: a comparison study to invasive ductal and invasive lobular carcinomas of the breast
    Arps, David P.
    Healy, Patrick
    Zhao, Lili
    Kleer, Celina G.
    Pang, Judy C.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 138 (03) : 719 - 726
  • [4] Comparison of the clinicopathological features of invasive ductal, invasive lobular, and mixed (invasive ductal plus invasive lobular) carcinoma of the breast
    Zengel, Baha
    Yararbas, Ulkem
    Duran, Ali
    Uslu, Adam
    Eliyatkin, Nukhet
    Demirkiran, Mehmet Ali
    Cengiz, Fevzi
    Simsek, Cens
    Postaci, Hakan
    Vardar, Enver
    Durusoy, Raika
    [J]. BREAST CANCER, 2015, 22 (04) : 374 - 381
  • [5] Different responses to preoperative chemotherapy for invasive lobular and invasive ductal breast carcinoma
    Cocquyt, VF
    Blondeel, PN
    Depypere, HT
    Praet, MM
    Schelfhout, VR
    Silva, OE
    Hurley, J
    Serreyn, RF
    Daems, KK
    Van Belle, SJP
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 29 (04): : 361 - 367
  • [6] Imaging features of invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Cha, Eun Suk
    Park, Chang Suk
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Whang, In Yong
    Lee, A. Won
    Song, Byung Joo
    Park, Jeongmi
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 29 (07) : 475 - 482
  • [7] Imaging features of invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
    Sung Hun Kim
    Eun Suk Cha
    Chang Suk Park
    Bong Joo Kang
    In Yong Whang
    A. Won Lee
    Byung Joo Song
    Jeongmi Park
    [J]. Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2011, 29 : 475 - 482
  • [8] Ultrasound findings in pure invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: comparison with matched cases of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
    Pointon, KS
    Cunningham, DA
    [J]. BREAST, 1999, 8 (04): : 188 - 190
  • [9] Comparison of Enhancement Characteristics Between Invasive Lobular Carcinoma and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Veltman, Jeroen
    Huisman, Henkjan
    Boetes, Carla
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 34 (02) : 293 - 300
  • [10] A Comparison of the Clinicopathological Features, Metastasis Sites and Survival Outcomes of Invasive Lobular, Invasive Ductal and Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular Breast Carcinoma
    Duraker, Nuvit
    Hot, Semih
    Akan, Arzu
    Nayir, Pinar Ozay
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2020, 16 (01) : 22 - 31