Evaluation of MIMIC-Model Methods for DIF Testing With Comparison to Two-Group Analysis

被引:133
|
作者
Woods, Carol M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST; IRT; ANXIETY; BIAS; AGE; DEPRESSION; PARAMETERS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/00273170802620121
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when an item on a test or questionnaire has different measurement properties for 1 group of people versus another, irrespective of mean differences on the construct. This study focuses on the use of multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) structural equation models for DIF testing, parameterized as item response models. The accuracy of these methods, and the sample size requirements, are not well established. This study examines the accuracy of MIMIC methods for DIF testing when the focal group is small and compares results with those obtained using 2-group item response theory (IRT). Results support the utility of the MIMIC approach. With small focal-group samples, tests of uniform DIF with binary or 5-category ordinal responses were more accurate with MIMIC models than 2-group IRT. Recommendations are offered for the application of MIMIC methods for DIF testing.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 27
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Illustration of MIMIC-Model DIF Testing with the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality
    Carol M. Woods
    Thomas F. Oltmanns
    Eric Turkheimer
    [J]. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2009, 31
  • [2] Illustration of MIMIC-Model DIF Testing with the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality
    Woods, Carol M.
    Oltmanns, Thomas F.
    Turkheimer, Eric
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2009, 31 (04) : 320 - 330
  • [3] The Langer-Improved Wald Test for DIF Testing With Multiple Groups: Evaluation and Comparison to Two-Group IRT
    Woods, Carol M.
    Cai, Li
    Wang, Mian
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2013, 73 (03) : 532 - 547
  • [4] A Comparison of Two-Group Classification Methods
    Holden, Jocelyn E.
    Finch, W. Holmes
    Kelley, Ken
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2011, 71 (05) : 870 - 901
  • [5] A two-group regional growth model
    不详
    [J]. THEORY OF INTERREGIONAL DYNAMICS: MODELS OF CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE AND ECONOMIC STRUCTURES, 2003, 523 : 61 - 77
  • [6] Vaccination in a two-group epidemic model
    Anita, Sebastian
    Banerjee, Malay
    Ghosh, Samiran
    Volpert, Vitaly
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS LETTERS, 2021, 119
  • [7] A two-group evaluation to e-note
    Rashid, Shaista
    Rigas, Dimitris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2008, 2 (01): : 7 - 12
  • [8] Qualitative analysis of a two-group SVIR epidemic model with random effect
    Kaiyan Zhao
    Shaojuan Ma
    [J]. Advances in Difference Equations, 2021
  • [9] Combining discriminant methods in solving classification problems in two-group discriminant analysis
    Lam, KF
    Moy, JW
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 138 (02) : 294 - 301
  • [10] Crossed categorization beyond the two-group model
    Urada, Darren
    Stenstrom, Douglas M.
    Miller, Norman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (04) : 649 - 664