The impact of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices on diverse tropical marine communities in Australia's northern prawn trawl fishery

被引:101
|
作者
Brewer, David [1 ]
Heales, Don [1 ]
Milton, David [1 ]
Dell, Quinton [1 ]
Fry, Gary [1 ]
Venables, Bill [1 ]
Jones, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Cleveland, Qld 4163, Australia
关键词
turtle excluder devices; bycatch reduction devices; bycatch; prawn trawls; shrimp trawls; sea turtles; sea snakes; sawfish;
D O I
10.1016/j.fishres.2006.07.009
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
In 2001, paired-trawl comparisons were made during prawn trawl operations to assess the effect of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices on a range of species groups caught in tropical Australia. This study is one of the first to evaluate the commercial use of these devices in a tropical fishery. Nets with a combination of a turtle excluder device and bycatch reduction device reduced the catches of turtles by 99%, seasnakes by 5%, sharks by 17.7%, rays by 36.3%, large sponges by 85.3%, and small bycatch by 8%, however, these results were largely attributable to the influence of the turtle excluder devices. Nets with both devices also reduced the catch of commercially important prawns by 6%, but the proportion of soft and damaged prawns was reduced by 41%. The combination of these devices had no measurable impact on catches of any of the three byproduct species groups: Thenus spp. (Moreton Bay bugs), Teuthoidea spp. (squid) and Amusium pleuronectes (scallops). Turtles excluder devices reduced the numbers of larger sharks and rays (> 1 m) by 86% and 94%, respectively. They did not reduce the total number of sawfish caught, but did reduce the number of the most commonly caught species - the narrow sawfish (Anoxypristis cuspidata) - by 73.3%. Upward- and downward-excluding turtle excluder devices performed about equally for most species groups, although upward excluders were more effective for sharks and less effective for large sponges. The performance of BRDs was poor for most groups and could be improved by using them in more effective positions such as closer to the codend catch. The use of these devices is a major step towards ensuring the long-term conservation of many species, especially endangered sea turtles and vulnerable elasmobranchs. As fishers become more experienced in their use, we are optimistic that the fishery's impact on bycatch will reduce even further. Crown Copyright (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 188
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] An assessment of bycatch reduction devices in a tropical Australian prawn trawl fishery
    Brewer, D
    Rawlinson, N
    Eayrs, S
    Burridge, C
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 1998, 36 (2-3) : 195 - 215
  • [2] Ray bycatch in a tropical shrimp fishery: Do Bycatch Reduction Devices and Turtle Excluder Devices effectively exclude rays?
    Willems, Tomas
    Depestele, Jochen
    De Backer, Annelies
    Hostens, Kris
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2016, 175 : 35 - 42
  • [3] Effects of bycatch reduction devices in Queensland's (Australia) deepwater eastern king prawn (Melicertus plebejus) trawl fishery
    Courtney, A. J.
    Campbell, M. J.
    Tonks, M. L.
    Roy, D. P.
    Gaddes, S. W.
    Haddy, J. A.
    Kyne, P. M.
    Mayer, D. G.
    Chilcott, K. E.
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2014, 157 : 113 - 123
  • [4] An assessment of bycatch reduction devices in Kuwait's shrimp trawl fishery
    Al-Baz, A.
    Chen, W.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY, 2015, 31 (01) : 16 - 26
  • [5] Quantifying the effects of bycatch reduction devices in Queensland's (Australia) shallow water eastern king prawn (Penaeus plebejus) trawl fishery
    Courtney, A. J.
    Tonks, M. L.
    Campbell, M. J.
    Roy, D. P.
    Gaddes, S. W.
    Kyne, P. M.
    O'Neill, M. F.
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2006, 80 (2-3) : 136 - 147
  • [6] Factors affecting elasmobranch escape from turtle excluder devices (TEDs) in a tropical penaeid-trawl fishery
    Campbell, Matthew J.
    Tonks, Mark L.
    Miller, Margaret
    Brewer, David T.
    Courtney, Anthony J.
    Simpfendorfer, Colin A.
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2020, 224
  • [7] Validating ecological risk assessments for fisheries: assessing the impacts of turtle excluder devices on elasmobranch bycatch populations in an Australian trawl fishery
    Griffiths, SP
    Brewer, DT
    Heales, DS
    Milton, DA
    Stobutzki, IC
    MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2006, 57 (04) : 395 - 401
  • [8] Evaluations of the Nordmore grid and secondary bycatch-reducing devices (BRD's) in the Hunter River prawn-trawl fishery, Australia
    Broadhurst, MK
    Kennelly, SJ
    Watson, JW
    Workman, IK
    FISHERY BULLETIN, 1997, 95 (02): : 209 - 218
  • [9] Ecosystem impacts of the introduction of bycatch reduction devices in a tropical shrimp trawl fishery:: Insights through simulation
    Criales-Hernandez, MI
    Duarte, LO
    García, CB
    Manjarrés, L
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2006, 77 (03) : 333 - 342
  • [10] Effects of Turtle Excluder Devices on bycatch and discard reduction in the demersal fisheries of Mediterranean Sea
    Sala, Antonello
    Lucchetti, Alessandro
    Affronte, Marco
    AQUATIC LIVING RESOURCES, 2011, 24 (02) : 183 - 192