Maximizing Investigation Effectiveness in Digital Forensic Cases

被引:1
|
作者
Kalaimannan, Ezhil [1 ]
Gupta, Jatinder N. D. [1 ]
Yoo, Seong-Moo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Coll Business Adm, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA
关键词
Forensic Investigation; Multiple Investigators; Digital Evidence; NP-hardness; Mixed Integer Programming; Heuristic Solution;
D O I
10.1109/SocialCom.2013.93
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Forensic investigation refers to the use of science and technology in the process of investigating a crime scene so as to prove that the perpetrator has committed crime in a court of law. There is a need to collect and investigate evidences that are closely related to the nature of the crime in order to achieve the maximum overall effectiveness. There are two main approaches to crime scene investigation: Sequential and Parallel. In the former case, evidences are first collected from the crime scene and then sent to forensic laboratory for investigation while the latter approach deals with the simultaneous collection and investigation of evidences. In the previous work, sequential scenario involving a single investigator for time critical forensics cases has been solved. This paper deals with the sequential scenario involving multiple investigators. The problem of assigning the evidences to multiple investigators and finding their respective investigation times to maximize the overall effectiveness is formulated using a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model. While the general problem is NP-hard, a heuristic algorithm is proposed to solve the general problem. Experimental results are shown to evaluate the effectiveness of the heuristic to find either optimal or near-optimal solutions. This paper concludes with a summary of findings and some suggestions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 623
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A heuristic for maximizing investigation effectiveness of digital forensic cases involving multiple investigators
    Gupta, Jatinder N. D.
    Kalaimannan, Ezhil
    Yoo, Seong-Moo
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 : 1 - 9
  • [2] Cloudlet Solution for Digital Forensic Investigation of Multiple Cases of Multiple Devices
    Mthunzi, Siyakha N.
    Benkhelifa, Elhadj
    Jararweh, Yaser
    Al-Ayyoub, Mahmoud
    2017 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOG AND MOBILE EDGE COMPUTING (FMEC), 2017, : 235 - 240
  • [3] A New Approach of Digital Forensic Model for Digital Forensic Investigation
    Ademu, Inikpi O.
    Imafidon, Chris O.
    Preston, David S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 2 (12) : 175 - 178
  • [4] Comparative analysis on integrated digital forensic tools for digital forensic investigation
    Lee, Jae-ung
    Soh, Woo-young
    6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 2019 (ICAME 2019), 2020, 834
  • [5] Forensic Detection of Timestamp Manipulation for Digital Forensic Investigation
    Oh, Junghoon
    Lee, Sangjin
    Hwang, Hyunuk
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 72544 - 72565
  • [6] Digital forensic investigation in the age of ChatGPT
    Scanlon, Mark
    Nikkel, Bruce
    Geradts, Zeno
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-DIGITAL INVESTIGATION, 2023, 44
  • [7] Unboxing the digital forensic investigation process
    Horsman, Graeme
    Sunde, Nina
    SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2022, 62 (02) : 171 - 180
  • [8] Digital Investigation and Forensic User Analysis
    Olajide, Funminiyi
    Al-Hadrami, Tawfik
    James-Taylor, Anne
    RECENT TRENDS IN DATA SCIENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, IRICT 2018, 2019, 843 : 630 - 640
  • [9] Review of Digital Forensic Investigation frameworks
    Agarwal, Ritu
    Kothari, Suvarna
    Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2015, 339 : 561 - 571
  • [10] Digital forensic investigation framework for the metaverse
    Seunghee Seo
    Byoungjin Seok
    Changhoon Lee
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2023, 79 : 9467 - 9485