A COMPARISON OF CABAC THROUGHPUT FOR HEVC/H.265 VS. AVC/H.264

被引:0
|
作者
Sze, Vivienne [1 ]
Budagavi, Madhukar [2 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Texas Instruments Inc, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
HEVC; H.265; AVC; H.264; CABAC; throughput; arithmetic coding; VIDEO CODING HEVC; EFFICIENCY; STANDARD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The CABAC entropy coding engine is a well known throughput bottleneck in the AVC/H.264 video codec. It was redesigned to achieve higher throughput for the latest video coding standard HEVC/H.265. Various improvements were made including reduction in context coded bins, reduction in total bins and grouping of bypass bins. This paper discusses and quantifies the impact of these techniques and introduces a new metric called Bjontegaard delta cycles (BD-cycle) to compare the CABAC throughput of HEVC vs. AVC. BD-cycle uses the Bjontegaard delta measurement method to compute the average difference between the cycles vs. bit-rate curves of HEVC and AVC. This metric is useful for estimating the throughput of an HEVC CABAC engine from an existing AVC CABAC design for a given bit-rate. Under the common conditions set by the JCT-VC standardization body, HEVC CABAC has an average BD-cycle reduction of 31.1% for all intra, 24.3% for low delay, and 25.9% for random access, when processing up to 8 bypass bins per cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 170
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On Use of Crowdsourcing for H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC Video Quality Evaluation
    Zach, Ondrej
    Seufert, Michael
    Hirth, Matthias
    Slanina, Martin
    Phuoc Tran-Gia
    [J]. 2017 27TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE RADIOELEKTRONIKA (RADIOELEKTRONIKA), 2017, : 126 - 131
  • [2] A Study on Energy Used to Deliver H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC Video Content
    Safavi, Mohammadhassan
    Bastani, Saeed
    Zhang, Zhi
    Forsell, Martti
    Mammela, Olli
    Landfeldt, Bjorn
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON COMPUTER AIDED MODELLING AND DESIGN OF COMMUNICATION LINKS AND NETWORKS (CAMAD), 2016, : 170 - 176
  • [3] Which Metric Can Predict Coding Gain of H.265/HEVC over H.264/AVC?
    Xiao, Jianhua
    Song, Li
    Luo, Zhengyi
    Xie, Rong
    Zhang, Wenjun
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BROADBAND MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS AND BROADCASTING (BMSB), 2015,
  • [4] Performance Comparison of H.265/HEVC, H.264/AVC and VP9 Encoders in Video Dissemination over VANETs
    Iza Paredes, Cristhian
    Mohamad Mezher, Ahmad
    Aguilar Igartua, Onica
    [J]. SMART OBJECTS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR SOCIAL GOOD, 2017, 195 : 51 - 60
  • [5] Comparison Study of H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC and VP9-Coded Video Streams for the Service IPTV
    Uhl, Tadeus
    Klink, Janusz Henryk
    Nowicki, Krzysztof
    Hoppe, Christian
    [J]. 2018 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE, TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS (SOFTCOM), 2018, : 153 - 158
  • [6] Performance Comparison of H.265/MPEG-HEVC, VP9, and H.264/MPEG-AVC Encoders
    Grois, Dan
    Marpe, Detlev
    Mulayoff, Amit
    Itzhaky, Benaya
    Hadar, Ofer
    [J]. 2013 PICTURE CODING SYMPOSIUM (PCS), 2013, : 394 - 397
  • [7] Spectrum efficiency achieved by the implementation of DVB-T2 with H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC
    Gosta, Miran
    [J]. 2014 56TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ELMAR (ELMAR), 2014, : 127 - 130
  • [8] A No Reference Bitstream-based Video Quality Assessment Model for H.265/HEVC and H.264/AVC
    He, Tiantian
    Xie, Rong
    Su, Jia
    Tang, Xin
    Song, Li
    [J]. 2018 13TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BROADBAND MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS AND BROADCASTING (BMSB), 2018,
  • [9] Alternating asymmetric search range assignment for bidirectional motion estimation in H.265/HEVC and H.264/AVC
    Zhou, Jinjia
    Zhou, Dajiang
    Goto, Satoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION, 2014, 25 (05) : 1275 - 1286
  • [10] Datasets for AVC (H.264) and HEVC (H.265) Evaluation of Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH)
    Quinlan, Jason J.
    Zahran, Ahmed H.
    Sreenan, Cormac J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS (MMSYS'16), 2016, : 386 - 391