Improvement in quality indicators using NCDR® registries: First international experience

Background: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR (R)) Database is commonly used for quality-improvement initiatives in North America, but little is known about the application of this tool in other regions of the world. Methods: All consecutive patients admitted due to myocardial infarction (MI) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2012 until December 2015 in a Brazilian private cardiovascular hospital were included respectively in ACTION REGISTRY (R)-GWTG (TM) and CathPCI Registry (R). Meetings including all hospital staff were performed quarterly to discuss every NCDR (R) report. Quality improvement initiatives were developed based on the reports which were also used for evaluation of changes after the interventions. The following indicators were considered a priority 1) Door-to-ECG and door-to-balloon (D2B) times; 2) PCI appropriateness; 3) length of stay; 4) delivery of guideline-based medication. Changes in the quality of care with respect to the over time were assessed using linear and logistic regression for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. Results: A total of 1.382 patients were included in the ACTION REGISTRY (R)-GWTG (TM) and 3.179 patients in the CathPCI Registry (R). In the ACTION registry, the overall AMI performance composite of quality indicators improved along the 4 years from 95.0% to 99.6% (p for trend <0.001). The percentage of appropriate/uncertain PCI in acute and elective scenario increased along the years from 91.1% and 70.9% to 96.6% and 84.7%, respectively (p for trend <0.001). Conclusion: The present novel experience using the NCDR (R) registries as benchmarks to guide quality improvement programs in an international site was associated with improvement in quality indicators. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.