Recidivism Risk Assessment for Adult Sexual Offenders

被引:4
|
作者
Holoyda, Brian J. [1 ]
Newman, William J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Davis Sch Med, 2230 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, 1438 S Grand Blvd, St Louis, MO 63104 USA
关键词
Sexual offending; Sexual offender; Sexual violence risk assessment; Static-99; SVR-20; Penile plethysmography; Visual reaction time; ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; ACCURACY; VIOLENCE; AROUSAL; STATIC-99; SVR-20;
D O I
10.1007/s11920-015-0650-5
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Sexual offending is a significant public health problem in the USA due to its prevalence and the substantial impact it has on victims, victims' families, and the legal and mental health systems. The assessment of sexual offender recidivism risk is an important aspect of developing effective management strategies for sexual offenders in terms of placement, treatment, and other interventions. Researchers have developed numerous tools to aid in the assessment of sexual violence recidivism risk, including actuarial measures, structured professional judgment methods, and psychophysiologic assessment of sexual interests. The Static-99R and Sexual Violence Risk-20 are two instruments that have received substantial research attention for their ability to accurately compare offenders' risk of recidivism to normative group data. Penile plethysmography and visual reaction time are used to evaluate subjects' responses to sexual stimuli in an effort to characterize offenders' sexual arousal and interest, respectively. Though current research has focused on risk assessment tools' predictive utility, future research will need to examine the impact that actuarial and structured professional judgment tools have on reducing recidivism if they are to have relevance in the management of sexual offenders.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recidivism Risk Assessment for Adult Sexual Offenders
    Brian J. Holoyda
    William J. Newman
    [J]. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2016, 18
  • [2] On the validity of the German risk assessment tool "Risk for Recidivism in Sexual Offenders"
    Suhling, Stefan
    Rehder, Ulrich
    [J]. FORENSISCHE PSYCHIATRIE PSYCHOLOGIE KRIMINOLOGIE, 2012, 6 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [3] Is impulsivity related to the risk of sexual, violent and general recidivism in sexual offenders of child and adult?
    Bertsch, Ingrid
    Courtois, Robert
    Reveillere, Christian
    Pham, Thierry Hoang
    [J]. ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2022, 180 (03): : 263 - 265
  • [4] The assessment of dynamic risk and recidivism in a sample of special needs sexual offenders
    Blacker, Janine
    Beech, Anthony R.
    Wilcox, Daniel T.
    Boer, Douglas P.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 2011, 17 (01) : 75 - 92
  • [5] Comparison of Measures of Risk for Recidivism in Sexual Offenders
    Looman, Jan
    Abracen, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2010, 25 (05) : 791 - 807
  • [6] Recidivism risk assessment in sex offenders
    Perez Ramirez, Meritxell
    Redondo Illescas, Santiago
    Martinez Garcia, Marian
    Garcia Forero, Carlos
    Andres Pueyo, Antonio
    [J]. PSICOTHEMA, 2008, 20 (02) : 205 - 210
  • [7] Assessment of sex offenders risk recidivism
    Bertsch, Ingrid
    Pham, Thierry
    Reveillere, Christian
    Courtois, Robert
    [J]. ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2017, 175 (03): : 294 - 296
  • [8] Recidivism in Sexual Offenders
    Palermo, George B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2015, 59 (06) : 563 - 564
  • [9] CAN WE DO BETTER?: The Assessment of Risk of Recidivism by Adult Sex Offenders
    Parent, Genevieve
    Guay, Jean-Pierre
    Knight, Raymond A.
    [J]. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2012, 39 (12) : 1647 - 1667
  • [10] A systematic review on the effectiveness of sex offender risk assessment tools in predicting sexual recidivism of adult male sex offenders
    Tully, Ruth J.
    Chou, Shihning
    Browne, Kevin D.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 33 (02) : 287 - 316