Efficacy of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:221
|
作者
Costa, Joao
Borges, Margarida
David, Claudio
Carneiro, Antnio Vaz
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Sch Med, Ctr Evidence Based Med, P-1699 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Santa Maria Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2006年 / 332卷 / 7550期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.38793.468449.AE
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the clinical benefit of lipid lowering drug treatment in patients with and without diabetes mellitus, for primary and secondary prevention. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Cochrane, Medline, Embase, and reference lists up to April 2004. Study selection Randomised, placebo controlled, double blind trials with a follow-up of at least three years that evaluated lipid lowering drug treatment in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Data extraction Two independent reviewers extracted data. The primary outcome was major coronary events defined as coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or myocardial revascularisation procedures. Results Twelve studies were included. Lipid lowering drug treatment was found to be at least as effective in diabetic patients as in non-diabetic patients. In primary prevention, the risk reduction for major coronary events was 21% (95% confidence interval 11% to 30%; P <0.0001) in diabetic patients and 23% (12% to 33%; P = 0.0003) in non-diabetic patients. In secondary prevention, the corresponding risk reductions were 21% (10% to 31%; P = 0.0005) and 23% (19% to 26%; P <= 0.00001). However, the absolute risk difference was three times higher in secondary prevention. When results were adjusted for baseline risk, diabetic patients benefited more in both primary and secondary prevention. Blood lipids were reduced to a similar degree in both groups. Conclusions The evidence that lipid lowering drug treatment (especially statins) significantly reduce cardiovascular risk in diabetic and non-diabetic patients is strong and suggests that diabetic patients benefit more, in both primary and secondary prevention. Future research should define the threshold for treatment of these patients and the desired target lipid concentrations, especially for primary prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1118C
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of statins in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Shen, X.
    Zhou, X. J.
    Zhang, Z. W.
    Zhang, X. Q.
    Zhao, J. Y.
    Xu, Q. L.
    Shang, H. X.
    Xie, T. Y.
    Dong, J. J.
    Liao, L.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2016, 59 : S485 - S485
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic and non-diabetic heart failure patients, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Awad, A. K.
    Hasan, M. Tarek
    Shih, M.
    Attia, A. N.
    Aboeldahab, H.
    Bendary, M.
    Bendary, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 941 - 941
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of Mazdutide on weight loss among diabetic and non-diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Nalisa, David Lubasi
    Cuboia, Nelson
    Dyab, Eman
    Jackson, Idongesit Linus
    Felix, Habimana Jean
    Shoki, Pantaleon
    Mubiana, Mary
    Oyedeji-Amusa, Mariam
    Azevedo, Luis
    Jiang, Hongwei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [4] Efficacy of Liraglutide in Non-Diabetic Obese Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Barboza, Joshuan J.
    Huaman, Mariella R.
    Melgar, Beatriz
    Diaz-Arocutipa, Carlos
    Valenzuela-Rodriguez, German
    Hernandez, Adrian, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (11)
  • [5] Localised insulin administration for wound healing in non-diabetic adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Bhuiyan, Zunira Areeba
    Adebayo, Oluwasemilore
    Ahmed, Zubair
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2023, 31 (04) : 516 - 527
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of liraglutide 3.0 mg in obese diabetic and non-diabetic patients-A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (vol 16, e14367, 2021)
    Konwar, Mahanjit
    Ravi, Renju
    Maurya, Miteshkumar
    Bose, Debdipta
    Jaiswal, Sanjeet Kumar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (12)
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of mirogabalin treatment in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Alyoubi, Reem Abdullah
    Alshareef, Aysha Abdulmalek
    Aldughaither, Saud Musaab
    Aljaroudi, Abeer Mahdi
    Alabdulwahed, Alwaleed
    Alduraibi, Faisal Muhammed
    Masoud, Ahmed T.
    Abu-Zaid, Ahmed
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (05)
  • [8] SAFETY PROFILES OF RANIBIZUMAB IN DIABETIC VERSUS NON-DIABETIC AMD PATIENTS FROM RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Bandello, F.
    Burian, G.
    Weichselberger, A.
    Hashad, Y.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 20 (03) : 633 - 633
  • [9] Efficacy of statins in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shen, Xue
    Zhang, Zhongwen
    Zhang, Xiaoqian
    Zhao, Junyu
    Zhou, Xiaojun
    Xu, Qinglei
    Shang, Hongxia
    Dong, Jianjun
    Liao, Lin
    [J]. LIPIDS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2016, 15 : 1 - 11
  • [10] Efficacy of liraglutide in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mali, Niroj
    Su, Feng
    Ge, Jie
    Fan, Wen Xing
    Zhang, Jing
    Ma, Jingyuan
    [J]. BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)