Outcome of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation ( PTNS) for Fecal Incontinence

被引:37
|
作者
Hotouras, Alexander [1 ]
Murphy, Jamie [1 ]
Walsh, Una [1 ]
Allison, Marion [1 ]
Curry, Ann [1 ]
Williams, Norman S. [1 ]
Knowles, Charles [1 ]
Chan, Christopher L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Ctr Digest Dis, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, Acad Surg Unit,Blizard Inst, London, England
关键词
anorectal physiology; fecal incontinence; neuromodulation; PTNS; tibial nerve stimulation; PERIPHERAL NEUROMODULATION;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6266c
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in fecal incontinence (FI). Background: There is extensive evidence regarding the efficacy of PTNS in urinary incontinence. Data on the efficacy of PTNS for FI are limited to a few small case series with relatively short-follow up. Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with FI was studied. Incontinence scores were measured using a validated questionnaire (Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score) at specific time points: before treatment, after completion of a treatment course (12 PTNS sessions), and before the last maintenance (top-up) therapy. Deferment time and average number of weekly incontinence episodes were also estimated from a prospective bowel dairy kept by the patient at these time points. Quality of life was assessed with the Rockwood Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire. Results: A total of 150 patients were recruited to the study between January 2008 and June 2012. Analysis was performed on 115 patients who continued to receive PTNS after a median follow-up of 26 (range, 12-42) months. The baseline Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score SD (12.0 +/- 3.9) improved after 12 PTNS sessions (9.4 +/- 4.6, P < 0.0001) and after top-up treatments (10.0 +/- 4.3, P < 0.0001). The increase in the Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score between the end of the 12th session and the last top-up therapy was also significant (P = 0.04). A similar pattern was seen for the deferment time and the quality of life scores. The median time between top-up sessions was 12 months (range, 1-40 months), significantly longer than the recommended interval of 6 months. Conclusions: PTNS is a well-tolerated treatment with high acceptability in the majority of patients. It provides a sustained improvement in FI up to 42 months in a relatively noninvasive manner. The effect of PTNS diminishes with time and additional therapy sessions at 6 monthly intervals may result in greater improvements. PTNS ought to be considered as the first step in all patients with FI refractory to maximum conservative therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 943
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) for double urinary and faecal incontinence
    Craig, H.
    Khunda, A.
    Anderson, C.
    Ballard, P.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 : 183 - 183
  • [2] Outcome of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence in Patients Refractory to Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation
    Hotouras, Alexander
    Murphy, Jamie
    Thin, Noel N.
    Allison, Marion
    Horrocks, Emma
    Williams, Norman S.
    Knowles, Charles H.
    Chan, Christopher L.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (07) : 915 - 920
  • [3] Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is beneficial in patients with faecal incontinence
    Yeluri, S.
    Waudby, P.
    Duthie, G. S.
    O'Grady, H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 : 38 - 38
  • [4] PERCUTANEOUS TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR FECAL INCONTINENCE.
    George, A.
    Panarese, A.
    Sala, S.
    Kalmar, K.
    Kokopoulis, K.
    Nicholls, R.
    Vaizey, C.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (05) : E58 - E58
  • [5] Prospective clinical audit of two neuromodulatory treatments for fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)
    Hotouras, Alexander
    Murphy, Jamie
    Allison, Marion
    Curry, Anne
    Williams, Norman S.
    Knowles, Charles H.
    Chan, Christopher L.
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2014, 44 (11) : 2124 - 2130
  • [6] Short-term outcome of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for the treatment of faecal incontinence
    E. Peña Ros
    P. A. Parra Baños
    J. A. Benavides Buleje
    J. M. Muñoz Camarena
    C. Escamilla Segade
    M. F. Candel Arenas
    F. M. Gonzalez Valverde
    A. Albarracín Marín-Blázquez
    [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2016, 20 : 19 - 24
  • [7] The efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for the treatment of urge faecal incontinence
    Abd Elwahab, S. M.
    Majeed, M.
    Hannon, M.
    Waters, P. S.
    McCourt, M.
    Andrews, E. J.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 184 : S176 - S176
  • [8] Prospective clinical audit of two neuromodulatory treatments for fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)
    Alexander Hotouras
    Jamie Murphy
    Marion Allison
    Anne Curry
    Norman S. Williams
    Charles H. Knowles
    Christopher L. Chan
    [J]. Surgery Today, 2014, 44 : 2124 - 2130
  • [9] Short-term outcome of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for the treatment of faecal incontinence
    Pena Ros, E.
    Parra Banos, P. A.
    Benavides Buleje, J. A.
    Munoz Camarena, J. M.
    Escamilla Segade, C.
    Candel Arenas, M. F.
    Gonzalez Valverde, F. M.
    Albarracin Marin-Blazquez, A.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2016, 20 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [10] Medium-term outcome of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence
    Hidalgo-Pujol, M.
    Andriola, V.
    Jimenez-Gomez, L. M.
    Ostiz, F.
    Espin, E.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2018, 22 (11) : 875 - 879